summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b6/a8251d9543686943e10048e39995923cf0d1d7
blob: 21dea5f89ce7ad672582cf3cabcbd5ad485d0416 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <wtogami@gmail.com>) id 1Z44uF-0004Bj-GS
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:12:47 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.192.173 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.192.173; envelope-from=wtogami@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pd0-f173.google.com; 
Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z44uD-00018s-PD
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:12:47 +0000
Received: by pdbki1 with SMTP id ki1so52189542pdb.1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 14 Jun 2015 03:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.229.65 with SMTP id so1mr38329636pac.92.1434276760103;
	Sun, 14 Jun 2015 03:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.93.72 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 03:12:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 00:12:40 -1000
Message-ID: <CAEz79Pp_6FhDjtR6emBcXf_WT14MbDaTxMbeAo=QAfhS-ihFCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Warren Togami Jr." <wtogami@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15ae73cbb1cb0518779475
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(wtogami[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z44uD-00018s-PD
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral
	Competent Entity
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 10:12:47 -0000

--047d7b15ae73cbb1cb0518779475
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Discomfort with Sourceforge

For a while now people have been expressing concern about Sourceforge's
continued hosting of the bitcoin-dev mailing list.  Downloads were moved
completely to bitcoin.org after the Sept 2014 hacking incident of the SF
project account.  The company's behavior and perceived stability have been
growing to be increasingly questionable.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_a=
ds_and_installer

November 2013: GIMP flees SourceForge over dodgy ads and installer

https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/

May 28th, 2015: SourceForge replacing GIMP Windows downloads

http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2015/q2/194

June 3rd, 2015: Sourceforge hijacked nmap's old site and downloads.

When this topic came up over the past two years, it seemed that most people
agreed it would be a good idea to move.  Someone always suggests Google
Groups as the replacement host.  Google is quickly shot down as too
controversial in this community, and it becomes an even more difficult
question as to who else should host it.  Realizing this is not so simple,
discussion then dies off until the next time somebody brings it up.

http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-development/thread/1943127=
.DBnVxmfOIh%401337h4x0r/#msg34192607

Somebody brought it up again this past week.

It seems logical that an open discussion list is not a big deal to continue
to be hosted on Sourceforge, as there isn=E2=80=99t much they could do to s=
crew it
up.  I personally think moving it away now would be seen as a gesture that
we do not consider their behavior to be acceptable.  There are also some
benefits in being hosted elsewhere, at an entity able to professionally
maintain their infrastructure while also being neutral to the content.

Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Competent Entity

Bitcoin is a global infrastructure development project where it would be
politically awkward for any of the existing Bitcoin companies or orgs to
host due to questions it would raise about perceived political control.
For example, consider a bizarro parallel universe where MtGox was the
inventor of Bitcoin, where they hosted its development infrastructure and
dev list under their own name.  Even if what they published was 100%
technically and ideologically equivalent to the Bitcoin we know in our
dimension, most people wouldn't have trusted it merely due to appearances
and it would have easily gone nowhere.

I had a similar thought process last week when sidechains code was
approaching release. Sidechains, like Bitcoin itself, are intended to be a
generic piece of infrastructure (like ethernet?) that anyone can build upon
and use.  We thought about Google Groups or existing orgs that already host
various open source infrastructure discussion lists like the IETF or the
Linux Foundation.  Google is too controversial in this community, and the
IETF is seen as possibly too politically fractured.  The Linux Foundation
hosts a bunch of infrastructure lists
<https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo> and it seems that
nobody in the Open Source industry considers them to be particularly
objectionable.  I talked with LF about the idea of hosting generic
Bitcoin-related infrastructure development lists.  They agreed as OSS
infrastructure dev is already within their charter, so early this week
sidechains-dev list began hosting there.

From the perspective of our community, for bitcoin-dev it seems like a
great fit.  Why?  While they are interested in supporting general open
source development, the LF has literally zero stake in this.  In addition
to neutrality, they seem to be suitable as a competent host.  They have
full-time sysadmins maintaining their infrastructure including the Mailman
server. They are soon upgrading to Mailman 3 <http://wiki.list.org/Mailman3=
>,
which means mailing lists would benefit from the improved archive browser.
I am not personally familiar with HyperKitty, but the point here is they
are a stable non-profit entity who will competently maintain and improve
things like their Mailman deployment (a huge improvement over the stagnant
Sourceforge).  It seems that LF would be competent, neutral place to host
dev lists for the long-term.

To be clear, this proposal is only about hosting the discussion list.  The
LF would have no control over the Bitcoin Project, as no single entity
should.

Proposed Action Plan


   -

   Discuss this openly within this community.  Above is one example of a
   great neutral and competent host.  If the technical leaders here can agr=
ee
   to move to a particular neutral host then we do it.
   -

   Migration: The current list admins become the new list admins.  We
   import the entire list archive into the new host's archives for user
   convenience.
   -

   http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/  Kill bitcoin-list and
   bitcoin-test.  Very few people actually use it.  Actually, let's delete =
the
   entire Bitcoin Sourceforge project as its continued existence serves no
   purpose and it only confuses people who find it.  By deletion, nobody ha=
s
   to monitor it for a repeat of the Sept 2014 hacking incident
   <https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&px=3DMTc4Mzg> or GIM=
P-type
   hijacking <https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/>?
   -

   The toughest question would be the appropriateness of auto-importing the
   subscriber list to another list server, as mass imports have a tendency =
to
   upset people.


Thoughts?

Warren Togami

--047d7b15ae73cbb1cb0518779475
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><span id=3D"docs-internal-guid-cd22e7b4-f189-548c-2b68-16e=
89353a192"><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-b=
ottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;fo=
nt-weight:bold;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-colo=
r:transparent">Discomfort with Sourceforge</span></p><p dir=3D"ltr" style=
=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-=
size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-spa=
ce:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">For a while now people have been =
expressing concern about Sourceforge&#39;s continued hosting of the bitcoin=
-dev mailing list.=C2=A0 Downloads were moved completely to <a href=3D"http=
://bitcoin.org">bitcoin.org</a> after the Sept 2014 hacking incident of the=
 SF project account.=C2=A0 The company&#39;s behavior and perceived stabili=
ty have been growing to be increasingly questionable.</span></p><br><p dir=
=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span =
style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:base=
line;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent"><a href=3D"http://w=
ww.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_over_dodgy_ads_and_i=
nstaller">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/11/08/gimp_dumps_sourceforge_ov=
er_dodgy_ads_and_installer</a></span></p><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-heigh=
t:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.666666=
6666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;ba=
ckground-color:transparent">November 2013: GIMP flees SourceForge over dodg=
y ads and installer</span></p><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;marg=
in-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;f=
ont-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-co=
lor:transparent"><a href=3D"https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/">https://lwn.n=
et/Articles/646118/</a></span></p><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;=
margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667=
px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;backgroun=
d-color:transparent">May 28th, 2015: SourceForge replacing GIMP Windows dow=
nloads</span></p><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;ma=
rgin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Ar=
ial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transpare=
nt"><a href=3D"http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2015/q2/194">http://seclists.or=
g/nmap-dev/2015/q2/194</a></span></p><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.=
38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666=
667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;backgr=
ound-color:transparent">June 3rd, 2015: Sourceforge hijacked nmap&#39;s old=
 site and downloads.</span></p><br><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38=
;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.666666666666=
7px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;backgrou=
nd-color:transparent">When this topic came up over the past two years, it s=
eemed that most people agreed it would be a good idea to move.=C2=A0 Someon=
e always suggests Google Groups as the replacement host.=C2=A0 Google is qu=
ickly shot down as too controversial in this community, and it becomes an e=
ven more difficult question as to who else should host it.=C2=A0 Realizing =
this is not so simple, discussion then dies off until the next time somebod=
y brings it up.</span></p><br><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;marg=
in-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;f=
ont-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-co=
lor:transparent"><a href=3D"http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoi=
n-development/thread/1943127.DBnVxmfOIh%401337h4x0r/#msg34192607">http://so=
urceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-development/thread/1943127.DBnVxmfO=
Ih%401337h4x0r/#msg34192607</a></span></p><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-heig=
ht:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.66666=
66666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;b=
ackground-color:transparent">Somebody brought it up again this past week.</=
span></p><br><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin=
-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;=
vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">=
It seems logical that an open discussion list is not a big deal to continue=
 to be hosted on Sourceforge, as there isn=E2=80=99t much they could do to =
screw it up.=C2=A0 I personally think moving it away now would be seen as a=
 gesture that we do not consider their behavior to be acceptable.=C2=A0 The=
re are also some benefits in being hosted elsewhere, at an entity able to p=
rofessionally maintain their infrastructure while also being neutral to the=
 content.</span></p><br><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top=
:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-fa=
mily:Arial;font-weight:bold;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;ba=
ckground-color:transparent">Proposal: Move Bitcoin Dev List to a Neutral Co=
mpetent Entity</span></p><br><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margi=
n-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;fo=
nt-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-col=
or:transparent">Bitcoin is a global infrastructure development project wher=
e it would be politically awkward for any of the existing Bitcoin companies=
 or orgs to host due to questions it would raise about perceived political =
control.=C2=A0 For example, consider a bizarro parallel universe where MtGo=
x was the inventor of Bitcoin, where they hosted its development infrastruc=
ture and dev list under their own name.=C2=A0 Even if what they published w=
as 100% technically and ideologically equivalent to the Bitcoin we know in =
our dimension, most people wouldn&#39;t have trusted it merely due to appea=
rances and it would have easily gone nowhere.</span></p><br><p dir=3D"ltr" =
style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"=
font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;whit=
e-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">I had a similar thought proc=
ess last week when sidechains code was approaching release. Sidechains, lik=
e Bitcoin itself, are intended to be a generic piece of infrastructure (lik=
e ethernet?) that anyone can build upon and use.=C2=A0 We thought about Goo=
gle Groups or existing orgs that already host various open source infrastru=
cture discussion lists like the IETF or the Linux Foundation.=C2=A0 Google =
is too controversial in this community, and the IETF is seen as possibly to=
o politically fractured.=C2=A0 The Linux Foundation hosts a </span><a href=
=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo" style=3D"text-decor=
ation:none"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;t=
ext-decoration:underline;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;backg=
round-color:transparent">bunch of infrastructure lists</span></a><span styl=
e=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline=
;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent"> and it seems that nobo=
dy in the Open Source industry considers them to be particularly objectiona=
ble.=C2=A0 I talked with LF about the idea of hosting generic Bitcoin-relat=
ed infrastructure development lists.=C2=A0 They agreed as OSS infrastructur=
e dev is already within their charter, so early this week sidechains-dev li=
st began hosting there.</span></p><br><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1=
.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.666666666=
6667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;backg=
round-color:transparent">From the perspective of our community, for bitcoin=
-dev it seems like a great fit.=C2=A0 Why?=C2=A0 While they are interested =
in supporting general open source development, the LF has literally zero st=
ake in this.=C2=A0 In addition to neutrality, they seem to be suitable as a=
 </span><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;font-=
weight:bold;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:t=
ransparent">competent</span><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;fon=
t-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-colo=
r:transparent"> host.=C2=A0 They have full-time sysadmins maintaining their=
 infrastructure including the Mailman server. They are soon upgrading to </=
span><a href=3D"http://wiki.list.org/Mailman3" style=3D"text-decoration:non=
e"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;text-decor=
ation:underline;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-col=
or:transparent">Mailman 3</span></a><span style=3D"font-size:14.66666666666=
67px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;backgro=
und-color:transparent">, which means mailing lists would benefit from the i=
mproved archive browser.=C2=A0 I am not personally familiar with HyperKitty=
, but the point here is they are a stable non-profit entity who will compet=
ently maintain and improve things like their Mailman deployment (a huge imp=
rovement over the stagnant Sourceforge).=C2=A0 It seems that LF would be co=
mpetent, neutral place to host dev lists for the long-term.</span></p><br><=
p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><=
span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align=
:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">To be clear, t=
his proposal is only about hosting the discussion list.=C2=A0 The LF would =
have no control over the Bitcoin Project, as no single entity should.</span=
></p><br><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bot=
tom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;font=
-weight:bold;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:=
transparent">Proposed Action Plan</span></p><br><ul style=3D"margin-top:0pt=
;margin-bottom:0pt"><li dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"list-style-type:disc;font-size=
:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;background-co=
lor:transparent"><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;ma=
rgin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;vertical-align=
:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">Discuss this o=
penly within this community.=C2=A0 Above is one example of a great neutral =
and competent host.=C2=A0 If the technical leaders here can agree to move t=
o a particular neutral host then we do it.</span></p></li><li dir=3D"ltr" s=
tyle=3D"list-style-type:disc;font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial=
;vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent"><p dir=3D"ltr" style=
=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-=
size:14.6666666666667px;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;backgr=
ound-color:transparent">Migration: The current list admins become the new l=
ist admins.=C2=A0 We import the entire list archive into the new host&#39;s=
 archives for user convenience.</span></p></li><li dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"lis=
t-style-type:disc;font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(=
0,0,0);vertical-align:baseline;background-color:transparent"><p dir=3D"ltr"=
 style=3D"line-height:1.38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D=
"font-size:14.6666666666667px;color:rgb(34,34,34);vertical-align:baseline;w=
hite-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent"><a href=3D"http://sourcef=
orge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/">http://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/</a> =
=C2=A0Kill bitcoin-list and bitcoin-test.=C2=A0 Very few people actually us=
e it.=C2=A0 Actually, let&#39;s delete the entire Bitcoin Sourceforge proje=
ct as its continued existence serves no purpose and it only confuses people=
 who find it.=C2=A0 By deletion, nobody has to monitor it for a repeat of t=
he </span><a href=3D"https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Dnews_item&amp=
;px=3DMTc4Mzg" style=3D"text-decoration:none"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6=
666666666667px;text-decoration:underline;vertical-align:baseline;white-spac=
e:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">Sept 2014 hacking incident</span><=
/a><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;color:rgb(34,34,34);vertical=
-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent"> or </sp=
an><a href=3D"https://lwn.net/Articles/646118/" style=3D"text-decoration:no=
ne"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;text-decoration:underline;v=
ertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent">G=
IMP-type hijacking</span></a><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px;co=
lor:rgb(34,34,34);vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-c=
olor:transparent">?</span></p></li><li dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"list-style-type=
:disc;font-size:14.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baselin=
e;background-color:transparent"><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.38;ma=
rgin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666667px=
;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;background-color:transparent"=
>The toughest question would be the appropriateness of auto-importing the s=
ubscriber list to another list server, as mass imports have a tendency to u=
pset people.</span></p></li></ul><br><p dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"line-height:1.=
38;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:0pt"><span style=3D"font-size:14.6666666666=
667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-wrap;backgr=
ound-color:transparent">Thoughts?</span></p><br><span style=3D"font-size:14=
.6666666666667px;font-family:Arial;vertical-align:baseline;white-space:pre-=
wrap;background-color:transparent">Warren Togami</span></span></div>

--047d7b15ae73cbb1cb0518779475--