1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@bitpay.com>) id 1YqO1G-0005xR-Qu
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 07 May 2015 15:47:26 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com
designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.171; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com;
helo=mail-ob0-f171.google.com;
Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com ([209.85.214.171])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YqO1G-0005oI-6G
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 07 May 2015 15:47:26 +0000
Received: by obfe9 with SMTP id e9so34578676obf.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 07 May 2015 08:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=pixl84jMARTDt4BOqxw4eilB1WyvWZNAQtLRxqQWBKk=;
b=ZeRgjSAfL1I7c2qmUs61l3tCjDnbRj94h0u7f4DQHCoxEmZW80W3UcaWOiPNZ0W2cZ
jviKfGUJt3Q7GIPYUm5sWXoskWVh1j9gIIZmxWkeDfG1KbHMKqCGNJVO0gQaiMHd6z+E
acYNMVTpwU58Qf7rxTALbXsS0iIuWmfqAKa3574i0vEc78BynjuZ65fIJriPhb7qwisq
qbHuLHVydgpQVM5a2gd4Shd+9TfR68fIHcRke27eAt7PyIivwnz3ZVwFZR7aa/XKh6s/
y588JctwuWkv0Hhr3wTqhkK383cnkEAJHOuqbt1ezf5WL4846ltbp/z6h1tSHvvWOG+V
ywzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQklv2SWwhL6nE6t9XORPjKkg5J85wulY/BjbVyVTqUqoxxD+6VOXbZ415HwvTpaH3s3W4/n
X-Received: by 10.202.102.199 with SMTP id m68mr3529048oik.98.1431013640732;
Thu, 07 May 2015 08:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.108.149 with HTTP; Thu, 7 May 2015 08:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <554B85D9.4010304@localhost.local>
References: <554A91BE.6060105@bluematt.me>
<CANEZrP3wGWHdz+ut6pvke5TJJsc1rTFt8sn2KziX35oL5LAsyg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0Mr6aQcVRKtidc+qVR7-esriyp5kzAw1LMHHwOcXhhG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
<554B78DE.20600@localhost.local>
<CAJHLa0OXpbAeDsQknR0HewasPq0PYPLNU3yWJ+xzerB6CXX7jw@mail.gmail.com>
<554B81E2.6070607@localhost.local>
<CAJHLa0PtftFQiPhMBiYbAP98wMo48RtVvMSZRFuvf=2Gch8cxg@mail.gmail.com>
<554B85D9.4010304@localhost.local>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:47:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJHLa0OnzWwSoKYhz=izzeV4pdkvPoMPeawgv2coH0S_cLycWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140a26ab9946605157fd3bd
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YqO1G-0005oI-6G
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 15:47:26 -0000
--001a1140a26ab9946605157fd3bd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net>
wrote:
> In summary, I asked a question neither you, nor Peter Todd, want to
> answer and want to actively discourage people from even asking at all.
>
Incorrect; your question included built-in assumptions with which I
disagree.
Bitcoin needs to be the best it can be (Layer 1), but all solutions cannot
and should not be implemented at Layer 1.
We need to scale up both bitcoin (L1) and solutions built on top of bitcoin
(L2).
--001a1140a26ab9946605157fd3bd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
hu, May 7, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Justus Ranvier <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:justusranvier@riseup.net" target=3D"_blank">justusranvier@riseup=
.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"ma=
rgin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">In summary, I =
asked a question neither you, nor Peter Todd, want to<br>
answer and want to actively discourage people from even asking at all.<br><=
/blockquote><div><br></div><div>Incorrect; your question included built-in =
assumptions with which I disagree.<br><br></div><div>Bitcoin needs to be th=
e best it can be (Layer 1), but all solutions cannot and should not be impl=
emented at Layer 1.<br><br></div><div>We need to scale up both bitcoin (L1)=
and solutions built on top of bitcoin (L2).<br><br></div><div><br><br><br>=
<br>=C2=A0<br></div></div></div></div>
--001a1140a26ab9946605157fd3bd--
|
