1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
|
Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE160C0032
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:26:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B932E61020
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:26:41 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org B932E61020
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 8uYEzF_LHoPp
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:26:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cerulean.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC21460F9B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:26:40 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org AC21460F9B
Received: from aj@azure.erisian.com.au
by cerulean.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <aj@erisian.com.au>)
id 1quu0v-0007Tj-LU; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:26:36 +1000
Received: by email (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:26:26 +1000
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:26:26 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <ZTZmcis5IkIGazYq@erisian.com.au>
References: <CAEM=y+XDB7GGa5BTAWrQHqTqQHBE2VRyd7VWjEb+zCOMzRP+Lg@mail.gmail.com>
<871qdmulvt.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871qdmulvt.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_bar: /
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for OP_CAT
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:26:42 -0000
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:43:10PM +1030, Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> 2. Was there a concrete rationale for maintaining 520 bytes?
Without a limit of 520 bytes, then you can construct a script:
<p> CHECKSIGVERIFY
{DUP CAT}x10
(we know have a string that is the second witness repeated 1024 times
on the stack; if it was 9 bytes, call it 9216B total)
{DUP} x 990
(we now have 1000 strings each of length 9216B bytes, for ~9.2MB total)
SHA256SUM {CAT SHA256SUM}x999
(we now have a single 32B field on the stack)
<h> EQUAL
(and can do a hardcoded check to make sure there weren't any
shortcuts taken)
That raises the max memory to verify a single script from ~520kB (1000
stack elements by 520 bytes each) to ~10MB (1000 stack elements by
10kB each).
> 10k is the current script limit, can we get closer to that? :)
The 10k limit applies to scriptPubKey, scriptSig and segwit v0 scripts.
There's plenty of examples of larger tapscripts, eg:
https://mempool.space/tx/0301e0480b374b32851a9462db29dc19fe830a7f7d7a88b81612b9d42099c0ae
(3,938,182 bytes of script, non-standard due to being an oversized tx)
https://mempool.space/tx/2d4ad78073f1187c689c693bde62094abe6992193795f838e8be0db898800434
(360,543 bytes of script, standard, I believe)
Cheers,
aj
|
