summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b5/e3fd6a67a448ef123a62aba4ff606147b60d1c
blob: 7c6213dbdc6972745f51e642aca298102ecf913c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B45FFA74
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:36:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com (mail-yw0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.161.177])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C77F16A
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:36:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l21so3081911ywb.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; 
	bh=2KvmeMg5DdJoHvw1aDyAf41YmR2Swvq+JLu+BIiVr0g=;
	b=AVpqHpCcAiPdoqzE+28vI3wF1xaygKRlBkG4iRvp6Fsh09PDh8YOEAn9sMlYYsHV5j
	wX6AMqI8Mmwz7i+pp3YZhQSvsNYX098rB+FzKiVQzYWvXO4lrpzbrzv4A+YNrvsaAvVM
	Fp3KlqDg7GkbN/G2pgaP7Gdg1mY9NlGN0N3c7NQ68ByO6gMio3g/0w9c3Jq52SiQFWqj
	fcSuOuEucecwAqHo7ugCnxuWFx63nrjGRtXXXokADV82v6+aZ6s5OH/kufp1aHTWygPT
	RuYCuIrIPEgUjW9Q5+LIiDayug9fVe5PMNBqgtFDsoYzs1URFOfMiFu//7Emvppm5eV7
	a6HA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=2KvmeMg5DdJoHvw1aDyAf41YmR2Swvq+JLu+BIiVr0g=;
	b=TENXcz9nthpWVK8jjzTMqKe4u7yvoxZqSMFHbNc6GD3lr/JY04KHRDdi/BPWoT7fke
	aZkESTr3UxL8EpS+/fWbzd5ra3moVPukNo4P4/YFSx8Dkb0e6G9iOrpGxblX9usyE3Bx
	ESS6BR+kCYoaPxQXF/tfuE8xQgieEPCG2qIumsIIjTJla1cLpfWqz6mvPZTIWZwsy8RE
	R84OBcZD+tjqndTVS8mVduNFPqNpCUPbZ/zVuxVirwHvN5OZKoNmk8yqPMaAeThl9pqw
	2ZM+E53KHCUhOC8uuq6zGavMt6IEVPViycycIt37TKVfpfGk+uxZ+QaqyZ6k/TlfoeJ3
	wpRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113grbTon4fN5xSZgAMpk+dkmeAwa7Uj4r4KVwvZRR9PfkqtEEkN
	hzKYoBI9iVrhg/nQgxnQyuIFCoFPxQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.51.77 with SMTP id z74mr539834ywz.184.1499816173319;
	Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.71.4 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 16:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1c1d06a9-2e9f-5b2d-42b7-d908ada4b09e@gmail.com>
References: <0119661e-a11a-6d4b-c9ec-fd510bd4f144@gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgRDVgdMYZo776iLwbm23aGNDWL85YgD=yF=M-0_vqJ5nQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1c1d06a9-2e9f-5b2d-42b7-d908ada4b09e@gmail.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:36:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBax_yfA8Zb_sFhHh9Ap-qzMryA38i360LrrC7bt8viuvRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Sztorc <truthcoin@gmail.com>, Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>,
	Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>, 
	Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:36:26 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Updating the Scaling Roadmap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:36:14 -0000

I can't help but notice that I have read Greg's email before-- all the
way back in 2016. It would have been impossible for him to write a
reply to Paul's current email back then... but I also notice that Greg
did not indicate that he was copy-pasting until the very end (and even
then his aside at the end was sort of not the most clear it could have
been I think).

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 7/11/2017 5:11 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> [  Note 1: I think it is important to disclose that several of the
>> items in this list appear to be more or less quoted out of my own
>> blockstream-internal descriptions of things we've been working on in
>> Bitcoin.
>> A while back Adam Back asked me to publish something which contained
>> significant chunks of this document more or less verbatim,
[ snip ]
> I am not exactly sure what you are insinuating but I encourage you to
> clarify it.

I believe that's an artifact of a 2016 email. And the rest of it, for
that matter. See below.

>> and I
>> declined saying that I personally disagree with some of his points and
>> didn't think that Blockstream attempting to redirect the Bitcoin
>> project (esp towards drivechains) was appropriate-- along with my
>> (above) views on roadmaps (which I have included here a private email
>> thread on the subject). I feel it's important to disclose this, and
>> that the document was not otherwise created with the input of project
>> contributors (except Luke-Jr, apparently). I wasn't previously aware
>> that Adam had been working with Paul on this, had I been I would have
>> also encouraged people to be a little more transparent about it. ]
> I really don't understand what you are disclosing. That Adam asked you
> for feedback on the draft? And then, in the next sentence, that not
> enough experts were asked for feedback on the draft? I'm legitimately
> confused by this part.
>
> As I stated, we can remove the drivechain section. But surely you can
> appreciate how bizarre your position on roadmaps is. What exactly, did
> you intended to create at [1]? Since it is described explicitly as "the
> roadmap in Capacity increases for the Bitcoin system", have you been
> disagreeing with it's characterization as a 'roadmap' this entire time?
> One wonders why you haven't said anything until now.
>
> [1] https://bitcoincore.org/en/2015/12/21/capacity-increase/

The vast majority of Greg's email, including all the positiontext on
roadmaps was mostly text sent on 2016-11-04 to Adam Back, myself,
Wladimir, and others. Some of the other parts aren't, like the part
mentioning Blockstream.

Here is a commitment to a list of the recipients (for whatever good
such a commitment might do):
b1e575e15d86a5a5931ea0bc519701df4cc152f020f03cd7912074ce5c36260a

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507