summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b5/0249b7cd5a2f45f7d2eafee971c7a77ca6093b
blob: 19fe4544cb6b0f10e432648abe36893c444c5af3 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
Return-Path: <jaejoon@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759D4720
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat,  8 Apr 2017 16:16:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wr0-f178.google.com (mail-wr0-f178.google.com
	[209.85.128.178])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24081B9
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat,  8 Apr 2017 16:16:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wr0-f178.google.com with SMTP id g19so81443144wrb.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 08 Apr 2017 09:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=pMm1jpvMF1zNOc7zUrw4hxE7brwL+fy9ftmdP+G1liM=;
	b=buUZqwJd6A3ouKcma8GOcxG/P7214YrS5lAN4Qg/U2Wl8JREAxoR6zZYQxuFEXBMZ/
	yVllQjlnvhP0RzlxDqW12am/fQC4dWC0LJj0fv7OZiLM9tvOTKEy1lJMUiCKCJ6kI1OK
	ZFHygY/evolAz4a2IWPeyYGJJxuSnuxezNoLYBroUTHc0VJZjeLFT7idOEUA1FYnFFiR
	0UwG0y6pp8i7qOCqTjdKG58JTZbidzrhTE5Iwv6CdmptWAXkeq1kmCtJfGVBBQstaB7G
	FCXuLF5USc72+A76ynfpSWvGEQr2gfV+jmSHVzl57sS33Ifm0fisR5gw4CxiiChmhObQ
	5+Og==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=pMm1jpvMF1zNOc7zUrw4hxE7brwL+fy9ftmdP+G1liM=;
	b=s84O4tILz8ItfZ9gZ9wyKO3RzGOLkUi2xpYP3Ox8ORrpATDZt9QGIn+2BfO8RkrzxZ
	MN2Ky2vfAvfDcZRF9emw8evHWfDwiXZbXLiyh6vmOJVaTwJUWyeddOAgej1CJq2zy1bT
	wX84ldLr9FTT535+MV/enLFS3WpqkltgWLZQ4YWP6DxpRsxHfYl+8tYKshkiRyGniHOd
	ztfmghgrjjL8LPKP5L0z0pQEhQsTW2ML3OWoGCi0bB0xAR55szrIFqpbTLcvcJpMDkeJ
	offOCqqrY5wPmFIs/lzqhvYj1vzbgn4Eez3kkrsJ4rI6EwNCab/Emhwjy3ASJKmUalH9
	f/6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1V3OhyIx5kTmuXpqgZPDfi/51Se1PxF96wiQGYV4/iuGtGSAxgpucDLRrda2E218vZkHv7vVLKpOUXZg==
X-Received: by 10.223.142.45 with SMTP id n42mr16727957wrb.131.1491668165554; 
	Sat, 08 Apr 2017 09:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.134.243 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Apr 2017 09:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201704081605.10175.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAJR7vkpRhNsQsem-nFkeubX04xx1y7aHwCENfg0d1266oOsXMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<201704081459.13185.luke@dashjr.org>
	<CAJR7vkp4XCzqp-Lw4T_ssV8ZW0vgto62x7ee3PHzyZfAuK_=9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<201704081605.10175.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2017 11:16:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJR7vkoyTwvc73LUqcBgNTyhkG3FphJbmvfDGc6sCxPqm0ar9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f56e2217ad1054caa0f94
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:22:32 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Small Modification to Segwit
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 16:16:07 -0000

--f403045f56e2217ad1054caa0f94
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
>
> No, it isn't allowed right now. Doing it wouldn't invalidate blocks, but it
> would clearly be an attack on the network and cause harm. The same as if
> miners were to maliciously mine only empty blocks.
>
>
What's your definition of "allowed" then? Because a miner definitely can
mine only empty blocks and a miner definitely can do overt ASICBoost (using
as little as 1 bit of the version field) right now. I thought you meant
allowed in the sense that if a block is allowed, it is a valid block on the
network. It sounds like you mean something else, perhaps, "a block is
allowed if it doesn't cause harm to the network." I'm not sure how you
quantify that as that seems pretty subjective.

--f403045f56e2217ad1054caa0f94
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><br>
</span>No, it isn&#39;t allowed right now. Doing it wouldn&#39;t invalidate=
 blocks, but it<br>
would clearly be an attack on the network and cause harm. The same as if<br=
>
miners were to maliciously mine only empty blocks.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br></font></span></blockquo=
te><div><br></div><div>What&#39;s your definition of &quot;allowed&quot; th=
en? Because a miner definitely can mine only empty blocks and a miner defin=
itely can do overt ASICBoost (using as little as 1 bit of the version field=
) right now. I thought you meant allowed in the sense that if a block is al=
lowed, it is a valid block on the network. It sounds like you mean somethin=
g else, perhaps, &quot;a block is allowed if it doesn&#39;t cause harm to t=
he network.&quot; I&#39;m not sure how you quantify that as that seems pret=
ty subjective.</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>

--f403045f56e2217ad1054caa0f94--