summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b3/485c05f92dd6c6460baea052e10dd1940b7552
blob: a5185e9195ae80158045f97f3896dce5707dfca5 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <rob.golding@astutium.com>) id 1VxuJy-0007uY-Jf
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 31 Dec 2013 08:05:02 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of astutium.com
	designates 80.76.216.240 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=80.76.216.240; envelope-from=rob.golding@astutium.com;
	helo=web.astutium.com; 
Received: from [80.76.216.240] (helo=web.astutium.com)
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1VxuJx-0004BB-0u
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 31 Dec 2013 08:05:02 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42691 helo=astutium.com)
	by web.astutium.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82)
	(envelope-from <rob.golding@astutium.com>) id 1VxtuE-0007aX-Uk
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 31 Dec 2013 07:38:27 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 07:38:26 +0000
From: rob.golding@astutium.com
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <op.w8x4c8vbyldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
References: <CAMkFLsSwKEiEtV1OaAsGPiU8iAWbb77fDNJDmRwbgKnZ_kjG6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20131230232225.GA10594@tilt> <201312310114.05600.luke@dashjr.org>
	<op.w8x4c8vbyldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
Message-ID: <9aaa913f73f45db41d94d93d02eed3fa@astutium.com>
X-Sender: rob.golding@astutium.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.5
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
	please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - web.astutium.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.sourceforge.net
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - astutium.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: web.astutium.com: authenticated_id:
	rob.golding@astutium.com
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
X-Headers-End: 1VxuJx-0004BB-0u
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Merge mining
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 08:05:02 -0000

> But there's so much 'dry powder' out there (GPUs), I wonder if *not*
> supporting merge-mining is any better? At least the attacker has to do
> some unique PoW, so you hope it's costing them something.

With lots of people having access to 100TH+ there's not really much 
'cost' to doing a 51% attack on an alt-coin beyond a short-term 
diversion away from 'profitable' mining.

At least by supporting merged mining, more miners are likely to 
'support' multiple coin types, thus making a 51% attack from an 
individual/group less straightforward.

>> The rational decision for a non-scam altcoin, is to take advantage of
>> merged mining to get as much security as possible.

Exactly.

Rob