1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A37BAC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:57:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148114.authsmtp.net (outmail148114.authsmtp.net
[62.13.148.114])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BBAE9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:57:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5T5v3xh045721;
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:57:03 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com
[75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5T5v003013053
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 06:57:02 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:56:59 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
Message-ID: <20150629055659.GC502@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <20150629050726.GA502@savin.petertodd.org>
<201506290540.26019.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAAS2fgRZh=__VGH8aJq4D9G62ostt20YUafJ66mm7BhdBRKe=Q@mail.gmail.com>
<201506290551.56764.luke@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kVXhAStRUZ/+rrGn"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201506290551.56764.luke@dashjr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: aa26a775-1e23-11e5-9f74-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAsUEkAaAgsB AmMbW1JeVVp7WWA7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr
VklWR1pVCwQmRRll A1geUhpydgZGfX0+ ZERrV3IVDRV4cxd6
RUtJFDgEZnphaTUa TUkOcAdJcANIexZF O1F8UScOLwdSbGoL
FQ4vNDcwO3BTJTpg CissFQBab1sPGnYG SggGFD4iWEcUAgs+
IlQqJ0YYG1cUP0Mu eUAqWV8ULhsfYgAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee deployment schedule
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 05:57:09 -0000
--kVXhAStRUZ/+rrGn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:51:55AM +0000, Luke Dashjr wrote:
> On Monday, June 29, 2015 5:43:13 AM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> > > Policy is node/miner fiat and not the domain of BIPs.
> >=20
> > Even accepting the premise that policy is pure local fiat, the
> > conclusion doesn't follow for me. BIPs about best practices or
> > especially anything where interop or coordination are, I think,
> > reasonable uses of the process.
> >=20
> > E.g. you might want to know what other kinds of policy are in use if
> > you're to have any hope of authoring transactions that work at all!
>=20
> Then we are to start issuing a new BIP for every node's policy? This has =
no=20
> end - though it might make sense for an independent and updated database.=
=20
> Mixing protocol standards with policy suggestions makes a very risky situ=
ation=20
> where one can potentially hold a miner liable for not enforcing the BIP; =
ie,=20
> government regulation of Bitcoin itself. I don't think most people want t=
o go=20
> there...
Remember that one of the goals of full-RBF is to explicitly reject the
idea that miners should have any obligation with regard to what they're
mining. I perhaps should say that explicitly in my BIP proposal; I say
it implicitly by pointing out how the BIP *doesn't* define an exact
standard, but rather only an suggests an implementation as a starting
point.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000ffad4a87861689c067f5dd3b98b84d8096572c163aa913a
--kVXhAStRUZ/+rrGn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=JWHo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--kVXhAStRUZ/+rrGn--
|
