summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b2/832aec940643a415ca3a1449867278ad7d08fc
blob: 0c1f4011ff0f7e28166d2bc99ebd9915b3a27d66 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
Return-Path: <alicexbt@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3127C002D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:09:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9123A408D7
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:09:31 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 9123A408D7
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org;
 dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com header.i=@protonmail.com
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=protonmail3 header.b=VNxl7KtN
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Y7sWem5OaSQp
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:09:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 5ED6F400CB
Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch (mail-40137.protonmail.ch
 [185.70.40.137])
 by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ED6F400CB
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:09:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:09:16 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
 s=protonmail3; t=1669136964; x=1669396164;
 bh=q+NPZjJD/5FJf5Zy1azzOhhsKSlD1yiNnQw/w+v8QP0=;
 h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
 Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:
 Message-ID:BIMI-Selector;
 b=VNxl7KtN0o/ZaqRn0NN1JzsApVXbdR015d4nRfuutUmjUxv7mfNnJfsdYd9ISCxLx
 rMBqcDn7MIPACpFNJU5J9diq5jQUA63Ku0BcgE0jP3wjaA9FkF2YfSHRPhLjg3SiQp
 9PfjD0l4RsOU/lT1IrNxF1PjZsw0qP8Cvte6BTeSWcJcBcgu+VDeEghjPt6xwpQKl4
 S2WTADAS+NZHUGw+04C0qd4uLupGQIMp3QTU11IB0A93HO3Id/gnBGYz/61BpLUdOA
 KPZ1CqAbzXmaVoVPKWvUG8RVMHNJNROrGAfs1SorSU+JL/hJKi5uxsxGUEtfhN2okb
 HhwTXEWQ5Ei2Q==
To: Michael Folkson <michaelfolkson@protonmail.com>
From: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <3EotthoDUEkl3Vqv_PWkF47ytiPvGjBfNcK9fgWDEWkOYMgwdst38aoW7QJldTdIUKCPKV9fcsUnrdjs5aze6vRgs_TAU_qn3EoTU7DyAZc=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <_rvhg7VmWlwMShoKBmFOiEsVoI7so01bHe6_WI11o3bWmpllNhiqHBZQ7O_4GFu-OTqLaq8p4ndom2WeovfV59wnUbtqjAVnNckraYGU8AA=@protonmail.com>
References: <6lyH4IyNtVBlm_9wsr5UEAi8stIZN8OKNrcSJMOTJUiKE4MLoAMXluIR-4XJBHSwxpffEEsDCwkjQsrApqssvbIX_z_prQqfYbVa7JRJ3vE=@protonmail.com>
 <_rvhg7VmWlwMShoKBmFOiEsVoI7so01bHe6_WI11o3bWmpllNhiqHBZQ7O_4GFu-OTqLaq8p4ndom2WeovfV59wnUbtqjAVnNckraYGU8AA=@protonmail.com>
Feedback-ID: 40602938:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:23:14 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Custom signet for testing full RBF
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 17:09:31 -0000

Hi Michael,

> In this particular case the -mempoolfullrbf configuration option is in th=
e recent Bitcoin Core 24.0 release and so can be used both on mainnet and t=
he default signet, testnet etc. What could be tested on this custom signet =
that can't be tested on the default signet with Bitcoin Core 24.0? Perhaps =
there are some things that are easier to test with a smaller custom signet =
network starting from scratch?

1. Signet miners and dictators are not interested to use full RBF
2. Testnet is weird and I only use it when a project doesn't support signet
3. Mainnet v24.0 is not released yet although Peter Todd is trying few thin=
gs, I am not even sure if it will be available, testing should not depend o=
n politics.
4. Main/Default Signet miners and dictators did not respond or agree to use=
 full RBF.

Testing is important and I love it. I do not care about others.

> I know a number of people have struggled (e.g. [0], [1]) to get a custom =
signet set up. I think the CTV signet took a while to get set up too. It se=
ems you followed the instructions on the Bitcoin wiki [2] for setting this =
one up? Was there anything you found difficult or was counterintuitive gett=
ing this custom signet set up? You are the sole block signer on this custom=
 signet. How regularly are you mining blocks (e.g. strictly every 10 minute=
s, replicating the Poisson process on mainnet, adhoc etc?) Are you running =
this custom signet node on the same machine as a default signet, mainnet, t=
estnet full node? I'm a little tentative to start joining custom signet net=
works on the same machine that is already running other nodes but perhaps t=
here are no problems.=20

I had no issues except this command:

``
$ ../contrib/signet/miner --cli=3D"./bitcoin-cli" calibrate --grind-cmd=3D"=
./bitcoin-util grind" --seconds=3D600
```

I had no clue we need to wait for some seconds/minutes for output. Although=
 its okay.

I used default settings and it should mine with it forever or my AWS subscr=
iption is cancelled.=20

I am trying to help Bitcoin. Although not a big influencer. If most of the =
developers think its okay to test it directly on mainnet, there is nothing =
wrong with it. You will get some insights/bugs from this experiment if enou=
gh users try it.


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.ichael

/dev/fd0

------- Original Message -------
On Tuesday, November 22nd, 2022 at 4:50 PM, Michael Folkson <michaelfolkson=
@protonmail.com> wrote:


> Hi alicexbt
>=20
> Thanks for setting this up. Generally it seems to me like an excellent id=
ea to set up custom signets (and/or get proposals enabled on the default si=
gnet) for testing and experimenting with new proposals.
>=20
> I have two questions.
>=20
> 1) In this particular case the -mempoolfullrbf configuration option is in=
 the recent Bitcoin Core 24.0 release and so can be used both on mainnet an=
d the default signet, testnet etc. What could be tested on this custom sign=
et that can't be tested on the default signet with Bitcoin Core 24.0? Perha=
ps there are some things that are easier to test with a smaller custom sign=
et network starting from scratch?
>=20
> 2) I know a number of people have struggled (e.g. 0, 1) to get a custom s=
ignet set up. I think the CTV signet took a while to get set up too. It see=
ms you followed the instructions on the Bitcoin wiki 2 for setting this one=
 up? Was there anything you found difficult or was counterintuitive getting=
 this custom signet set up? You are the sole block signer on this custom si=
gnet. How regularly are you mining blocks (e.g. strictly every 10 minutes, =
replicating the Poisson process on mainnet, adhoc etc?) Are you running thi=
s custom signet node on the same machine as a default signet, mainnet, test=
net full node? I'm a little tentative to start joining custom signet networ=
ks on the same machine that is already running other nodes but perhaps ther=
e are no problems.
>=20
> I'm not sure yet if I have a use case in mind for this particular custom =
signet but I'm very interested in custom signet setup generally and the doc=
s/resources to make this as easy as possible so thanks again for posting ab=
out this.
>=20
> Thanks
> Michael
>=20
> 0: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/114477/could-someone-share=
-with-me-some-documentations-or-sites-on-how-to-set-up-a-cust
> 1: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/114724/peer-discovery-on-a=
-custom-signet-custom-signetchallenge
> 2: 0: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Signet#Custom_Signet
>=20
> --
> Michael Folkson
> Email: michaelfolkson at protonmail.com
> Keybase: michaelfolkson
> PGP: 43ED C999 9F85 1D40 EAF4 9835 92D6 0159 214C FEE3
>=20
>=20
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Sunday, November 20th, 2022 at 08:36, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev bitcoin=
-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > Hi Bitcoin Developers,
> >=20
> > I have setup a custom signet for testing full RBF. You can connect to o=
ne or more of these nodes using `addnode`:
> >=20
> > 13.115.34.55 (issuer, full-rbf)
> > kfupbqwb2yvzzqjomfq5pkem553a6uzp2k73seqn4d46smy7azua.b32.i2p (rbf-optin=
)
> > luvczzzppiqnc2b7poivkxlugafe3uqaj245ebjqxtceio7poaorqcyd.onion (full-rb=
f)
> >=20
> > Example config:
> >=20
> > `signet=3D1 signetchallenge=3D5121035daaa313aada6310340a242af17238cc1fd=
8849e875940bce65a60ac7e0e0ff751ae proxy=3D127.0.0.1:9050 [signet] addnode=
=3Dluvczzzppiqnc2b7poivkxlugafe3uqaj245ebjqxtceio7poaorqcyd.onion mempoolfu=
llrbf=3D1`
> >=20
> > Example for a simple test case:
> >=20
> > - Run 2 nodes
> > - Connect node 1 with i2p node and use default opt-in rbf
> > - Connect node 2 with node 1 and onion node. This node should use `memp=
oolfullrbf=3D1` in config and compile bitcoind using PR #26454 branch
> > - Broadcast Tx1 using node 2 and replace with Tx2 using `bumpfee` RPC
> >=20
> > It will be fun to test with more nodes joining this custom signet. If a=
nyone interested to test, please post your bitcoin address in full-rbf room=
. We can even setup an explorer if this experiment makes sense.
> >=20
> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> >=20
> > /dev/fd0
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev