summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/b2/1ac906aab33b7c5a80a9f1dcab12c0ff737c54
blob: d62ec5cf90b9cb3986d406be19a2861bf3cb7bf1 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1Yy2as-0006r3-Ti
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 28 May 2015 18:31:50 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.215.42; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-la0-f42.google.com; 
Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com ([209.85.215.42])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Yy2as-0004IS-41
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 28 May 2015 18:31:50 +0000
Received: by labpy14 with SMTP id py14so26950330lab.0
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 28 May 2015 11:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.204.40 with SMTP id kv8mr4078128lac.113.1432837903754;
	Thu, 28 May 2015 11:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.90.75 with HTTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 11:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAjy6kBRJ6n_hE1EsDaGFDopw=TgTYsBqRK1jiaWaoBfvzk6YQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAjy6kDdB8uODpPcmS8h4eap8fke7Y2y773NHJZja8tB5mPk4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAjy6kAsNJNJHHU7H91LsAOJZUjiuy3V3r1n-wqntUhCHdgYKw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T03aNRC5DRbR06nNtsiBdJAcQsGAHvbCOe3pnuRpdvq5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAjy6kBRJ6n_hE1EsDaGFDopw=TgTYsBqRK1jiaWaoBfvzk6YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:31:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T3_bGMmRKNEmMczcLG9yLywW1LXBy7=3F30LdAOeM9VuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Steven Pine <steven.pine@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11347da6462d5d051728925e
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Yy2as-0004IS-41
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed alternatives to the 20MB step
	function
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:31:50 -0000

--001a11347da6462d5d051728925e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Can we hold off on bike-shedding the particular choice of parameters until
people have a chance to weigh in on whether or not there is SOME set of
dynamic parameters they would support right now?


-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--001a11347da6462d5d051728925e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Can we hold off on bike-shedding the particular choice of =
parameters until people have a chance to weigh in on whether or not there i=
s SOME set of dynamic parameters they would support right now?<div><br></di=
v><div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_sign=
ature">--<br>Gavin Andresen<br></div>
</div></div>

--001a11347da6462d5d051728925e--