1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <makosoft@gmail.com>) id 1RtFog-0000dI-SN
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:52:26 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.210.175; envelope-from=makosoft@gmail.com;
helo=mail-iy0-f175.google.com;
Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1RtFof-0002lE-Vl
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:52:26 +0000
Received: by iaby12 with SMTP id y12so6037731iab.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:52:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.236.3 with SMTP id uq3mr7531929igc.11.1328262739994; Fri,
03 Feb 2012 01:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.48.135 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:52:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <83F45CA3-D54A-499A-8A20-922CDEE52993@ceptacle.com>
References: <83F45CA3-D54A-499A-8A20-922CDEE52993@ceptacle.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:52:19 +0000
Message-ID: <CAB=c7Tp9Mu_-kux8gazysKVFHZaWZdEgsmoOVE+wz-AGYdN-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aidan Thornton <makosoft@gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=F8nager?= <gronager@ceptacle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(makosoft[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RtFof-0002lE-Vl
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.5.2 tag in github ??
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:52:26 -0000
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Michael Gr=F8nager <gronager@ceptacle.com> =
wrote:
> Hi Gavin, others?
>
> I am trying to redo the performance test of the libcoin client against th=
e 0.5.2 Satoshi client, that I have learned also have received quite some i=
mprovements in speed since 0.4.0 (e.g. from not verifying signatures on ear=
ly blocks).
>
> However, I cannot find any tag with v0.5.2 in github:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tags
I think that tag's in
https://gitorious.org/+bitcoin-stable-developers/bitcoin/bitcoind-stable
- a certain amount of developer politics seems to be involved, and
v0.5.2 may not have been pushed to the official github repository.
|
