1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <wendel@314t.com>) id 1VBXwC-0005oh-Iy
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:28:36 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-gh0-f170.google.com ([209.85.160.170])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VBXwA-0006a0-Sg
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:28:36 +0000
Received: by mail-gh0-f170.google.com with SMTP id z10so1055675ghb.15
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from
:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to;
bh=TeDFy1/UJ1MsEq6xlJpHbtBT8YrQFblfmPMDULfWATA=;
b=XETp5RIk4IoFx3/sKACskamQSfGEC98+kdM6CSvknu9nd/aZyPQ+AN7qFlc6rd/gCm
NuRx1v1QQASfMqh7XJOKochtHohMHA1NcLR0xWBR9/e+SP/s+AB1k34Py6p94E8OnzO6
6qK+9EOkq2/5TQ9cbQv2XRVCMFP1SdPw9NXXwphrpWH6m8S/qWNBJYlsnw8n8LfIaQQM
rvgGKMPCZzn89iqg6NCu/ek/+wMdFdnHbvjOcfg/jLsd+4u8mXWR3Gq4cDm8rWGAdiNo
uAf/9bWV5+e9W6Xco5c1AfYxW98lQyZPBleT1O0B7gLhlcikAtzhckafoclAVAmBPa86
7zNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl42uMIIuoGu8dFGOYPFevD4hn3NioiGR2+NJXYpvbkH9+90N0Y1D+YSCvJOAeRwyeXnFUP
X-Received: by 10.236.153.169 with SMTP id f29mr46923yhk.82.1376949464509;
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([96.47.226.19])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g25sm16399504yhg.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Wendell <wendel@314t.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_CFC2C841-B982-44C7-9763-5494AB9A72ED";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
From: Wendell <w@grabhive.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPaL=UWH=3qj7AW-azrO9rJqRj3BKBff8-eETfF03po9kPJO4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:57:06 +0200
Message-Id: <D31E9305-773C-4760-BD15-AB5C2E63D723@grabhive.com>
References: <20130819001357.GA4281@savin>
<CABsx9T3MFqmLchc1Uu20BhiVKsYWFtt0eneVSey846y2hdQ7Rg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPaL=UWH=3qj7AW-azrO9rJqRj3BKBff8-eETfF03po9kPJO4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Dillon <john.dillon892@googlemail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1VBXwA-0006a0-Sg
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom io attack effectiveness
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:28:36 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_CFC2C841-B982-44C7-9763-5494AB9A72ED
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
John,
I for one support your rallying cry of decentralization.
If you are implying that even 10,000 full nodes seems far, far too few =
for a distributed system that may ultimately face a very well-connected =
and well-funded threat model, I agree with you completely. However, I =
took Gavin's statement to mean something like a factual statement about =
the load-bearing nature of that many nodes, rather than an actual target =
number for some future iteration of the network.
Partial UTXO sets sound like a great idea -- are they really being =
ignored? I am pretty new to the development process here, but I assumed =
(as with many open source projects) that ideation, debate and =
implementation take a while to churn. Has a prototype of that been =
developed already, are you implying that you funded something like that =
and it never got built? If there are some GitHub links that I missed, =
please send them over.
Maybe you should open that topic back up in its own thread, so we can =
bring it back into view?
-wendell
grabhive.com | twitter.com/grabhive | gpg: 6C0C9411
On Aug 19, 2013, at 4:53 AM, John Dillon wrote:
> So tell us how is your "vision" of 10,000 big beefy full nodes with =
SPV peers
> any different from the Electrum model? These days Electrum clients =
have block
> headers and verify that transactions have merkle paths to the block =
headers.
> The only difference I see is that SPV uses bloom filtering and =
Electrum can
> query by transaction. But Mike wants to add querying by transaction to =
full
> nodes anyway, and one of the purported advantages of this UTXO proof =
stuff is
> that you can query servers for UTXO's by address, so I see no =
difference at
> all. A patch to do bloom filtering on Electrum would be amusing to me.
>=20
> Here you have Peter talking about clever ways to actually get =
decentralization
> by having SPV peers donate back to the network with spare bandwidth, =
like
> relaying blocks, not to mention his partial UTXO set ideas, and you =
completely
> ignore that. But I guess that would raise ugly questions when people =
realize
> they can't now contribute back to Bitcoin, because the blocksize is a =
gigabyte
> of microtransactions... It may also raise ugly questions with =
regulators that
> may find the idea of "full node =3D=3D data chokepoint =3D=3D =
regulatory chokepoint" an
> attractive notion. Why are there not any competent people other than =
Peter who
> really have the guts to bring up these proposals? I've little luck =
getting
> proof-of-concepts built for money anyway. Maybe we just have a darth =
of smart
> competent people in this space.
>=20
> You do a good job of signaling your priorities Gavin. The payment =
protocol
> includes no notion that you may want to pay anyone but a SSL certified
> merchant. Yes I know the crypto can be upgraded, but it says volumes =
that you
> pushed for that first, without even the slightest token effort to =
allow
> individuals to participate in any way. Sad given you have made things =
*less*
> secure because there is no safe way to get money *into* my wallet with =
the
> payment protocol, but could have been.
>=20
> Tell me, when my decentralization pull-req is voted on, which way are =
you
> planning on voting?
--Apple-Mail=_CFC2C841-B982-44C7-9763-5494AB9A72ED
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)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=RN3Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_CFC2C841-B982-44C7-9763-5494AB9A72ED--
|
