summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ab/f79f5e04e4e182681db4ea0c1f781ff1a87ed3
blob: 156fc7dcb654c874cae622794408769b3c273cb6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17B6BB36
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:00:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149095.authsmtp.com (outmail149095.authsmtp.com
	[62.13.149.95])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F55153
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:00:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
	by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7OI0oQI058032;
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:00:50 +0100 (BST)
Received: from muck (c-67-188-9-126.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.9.126])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7OI0jbB079959
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:00:48 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:00:44 -0700
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Message-ID: <20150824180044.GA5729@muck>
References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com>
	<20150824152955.GA6924@amethyst.visucore.com>
	<55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com>
X-Server-Quench: 0d0f93df-4a8a-11e5-b398-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aQdMdAYUGUATAgsB AmMbWl1eUF17XWs7 bQ1PbA1VfENQXgds
	T01BRU1TWkFvfmUB XExsUh57fgBPNnh1 YU8sXiRbCk15IRBg
	Rh9cRHAHZDJldTIc WUhFdwNWdQpKLx5A PgF4GhFYa3VsNCMk
	FAgyOXU9MCtqYB5Y XAAWLE4TR0lDOBkQ aicoORIIOB9Nfz80
	Nxs9J1JUNmcpWgAA 
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 67.188.9.126/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:00:53 -0000


--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev wrot=
e:
> Its more of a statement of "in the future, we expect things to happen
> which would make this an interesting thing to do, so we state here that
> it is not against spec to do so". Could reword it as "NODE_BLOOM is
> distinct from NODE_NETWORK, and it is legal to advertise NODE_BLOOM but
> not NODE_NETWORK (though there is little reason to do so now, some
> proposals may make this more useful in the future)"?

ACK

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000008aa6cf51dfde20be1d54e671494a44fb7f252fd4e913162

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=owxv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--