summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ab/6bffef28eeaf41a85c2775f266dc9fa668d656
blob: bb0b9d2f4bdb8485ccbfaa798a4b041c8d399e9a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
Return-Path: <cipher.anthem@gmx.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4074FCD9
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BF2FD
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:03:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [188.166.127.96] by 3capp-mailcom-bs16.server.lan (via HTTP);
	Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:03:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-83bd9372-08bc-4c3e-812f-206ed3322913-1442678624612@3capp-mailcom-bs16>
From: "cipher anthem" <cipher.anthem@gmx.com>
To: hearn@vinumeris.com
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:03:44 +0200
Importance: normal
Sensitivity: Normal
In-Reply-To: <CA+w+GKSK42DjSKqpWj9=s=catGox-n5+AWjh=Mg5=nRpxsf4HQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADm_WcaLKqhR=WcJ5B52Q9SAAa+AdZY6Kz5OCQVUc_RQm6e9gg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55F9E47D.50507@mattcorallo.com>
	<CAOG=w-t2ZYQbx8+mG5FX8vzgAC_tb8A6KMABmudHQbrquEqX-Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<55FC6EBF.9090504@mattcorallo.com>,
	<CA+w+GKSK42DjSKqpWj9=s=catGox-n5+AWjh=Mg5=nRpxsf4HQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-UI-Message-Type: mail
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vtstUu9kUwsDxZSCvcOUc6k7z+whtTdmNKmGKpoY3aw
	aQ2fKSTRmqROq+O1TlexvQ+yPJTGcvQCB9xKrae1l6LcKHpYwQ
	GCHUgfVXhr+eG1YYqNaqYzhHXCeL0qyeaMFYG71ltNq7Kx7e+P
	QPE5x2BV0ZUMNBEhmOw34WCwlXJ4jiNMfAJh5V3Knm0Dx4Hg2K
	wz1oRI7R5KghfVxuB9Rp/lDBg2GF08lByRr5M/H4X8aDKLwxDd
	JezFrOCATd+Wpatc7OuZ388S21qyIlcBg4u+/sWCcjqaOzHzC3
	SOVgaMx7gdtrzw9irMadnMAkotN
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6wPUPD3ARz0=:ljPFDK7KVJ68ziw9EYYB96
	+zIwVOqKZZbASbpKlOLnbqz+LRgiYdS0lPN1RKgmMT9BzsTLqAH8/KNiomoO5TPBo1E0wKT22
	pbunkhPac3Q7TpuogPUMm6aBcCeRoyBJLu5ADDCgimeTiFqwhGgHEbxlqo5CPLlmkrmA3033B
	OnK7+f4aYx2tgvpJQOnPEkuZcSVpN33CYKnjHf4p4Oq9PKUiobj60kisNaCQiRiC4ieoD2JI4
	gNN8tU2kbLhsB+ktrYVkBxV9HNHj2yvHzD78ILB+G6QCn19zUZThpC55GC6nGCDkBpp6Bj1Tp
	ffzZdwQQgG0Vq95PEzyC2zvECcKfxHfbxYJIeVvIu4+q9xbFoiFreaYzWkPSrSM+78mSLoeQk
	S4LntnXVrR/rs9R5M1Zx2MYGVfLoFO+kASP37Pc+ybVRXAUD+1mg8NLa0UMVE4PXcCIENJoun
	O3sg8dOsWg==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing
 list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Bitcoin conference micro-report
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:03:51 -0000

<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>
<div>Let me get this straight. You start this whole debate with a &quot;kick the can down the road&quot; proposal to increase the block size to 20MB, which obviously would require another hard fork in the future, but if someone else proposes a similar &quot;kicka the can&quot; proposal you will outright reject it?</div>

<div>&nbsp;</div>

<div>Now that the majority have clearly rejected your and Gavin&#39;s proposal you decide to act like a 2-year old and reject any solution which isn&#39;t your own? Why dont you go sulk in a corner somewhere? Luckily Gavin is a more level-headed and reasonable person than you.</div>

<div>&nbsp;
<div name="quote" style="margin:10px 5px 5px 10px; padding: 10px 0 10px 10px; border-left:2px solid #C3D9E5; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div style="margin:0 0 10px 0;"><b>Sent:</b>&nbsp;Friday, September 18, 2015 at 10:33 PM<br/>
<b>From:</b>&nbsp;&quot;Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev&quot; &lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt;<br/>
<b>To:</b>&nbsp;&quot;Matt Corallo&quot; &lt;lf-lists@mattcorallo.com&gt;<br/>
<b>Cc:</b>&nbsp;&quot;Bitcoin development mailing list&quot; &lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org&gt;<br/>
<b>Subject:</b>&nbsp;Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Bitcoin conference micro-report</div>

<div name="quoted-content">
<div>Any change that results in this happening all over again in a few years does not have consensus.</div>
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org <a href="https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></body></html>