1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
|
Return-Path: <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40993EE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:43:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com (st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com
[17.172.220.113])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63CC28F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:43:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [25.169.112.210] (unknown [24.114.22.25])
by st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Mar 31
2015))
with ESMTPSA id <0NS8007BX4O2X320@st11p02im-asmtp001.me.com> for
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:43:17 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000
definitions=2015-07-29_01:2015-07-28, 2015-07-28,
1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0
suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam
adjust=0
reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000
definitions=main-1507290010
Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-reply-to: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:43:14 -0700
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <D2CDA490-F04A-41EA-85F7-56BA5B052729@me.com>
References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure
isn't temporary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:43:25 -0000
> Enter a =A1=B0temporary=A1=B1 anti-spam measure - a one megabyte block siz=
e limit. Let=A1=AFs test this out, then increase it once we see how things w=
ork. So far so good=A1=AD
>=20
The block size limit was put in place as an anti-DoS measure (monster blocks=
), not "anti-spam". It was never intended to have any economic effect, not o=
n spam and not on any future fee market.
jp
|
