1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Return-Path: <crypto@timruffing.de>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265C9C0001
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:17:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D5C40359
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:17:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=timruffing.de
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id P4x9Z1M3jCKl
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:16:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:22 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org
[IPv6:2001:67c:2050::465:201])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8096F40355
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:16:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.241])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest
SHA256) (No client certificate requested)
by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2c0f4C4gzQjwb;
Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:08:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=timruffing.de;
s=MBO0001; t=1616234912;
h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
bh=TFjPo92f9l7/bJ8y59q0YPy3iIr+U7ogfA5S44HbYwA=;
b=lwbcuBnCcvuJv1oRn5k99LYvj8Nxp9Z/GNoqUPMN3KJW+6eTW10MfXcnM1tbKRY6OUkrtU
9jpKI3xZPot41yb5k7BjqG7YRfx1BIQDoy96Nfoc8IpSLEUCq9/lNW7RcmtYigph+z917V
H5wtjw6wpQ1QD3iF/93r9MtDAf3D48xYBYVY7F0Y4OZIapoAuqZA4AN8buTFnG9FU+04NA
XFfwksPZKpVDVK8FsWmAHJsN9Xf8GcUnPuiFjv8Acoon8SCLm9sJV15RUdI5cDic1wsE/H
uPq7KkglMop/ZO5geN7609r+LjCQqG/eb4807RhrRmUeaXYds3DTWujVmQnHFg==
Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241])
by spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de
[80.241.56.122]) (amavisd-new, port 10030)
with ESMTP id GTWDZiBxrZL8; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:08:31 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <62853a4db45c8c6a483fcb3ca05e0bb58e06a643.camel@timruffing.de>
From: Tim Ruffing <crypto@timruffing.de>
To: vjudeu <vjudeu@gazeta.pl>, Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 11:08:30 +0100
In-Reply-To: <125859088-3f93e6aca40d5c3244243540270cdb84@pmq7v.m5r2.onet>
References: <125859088-3f93e6aca40d5c3244243540270cdb84@pmq7v.m5r2.onet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MBO-SPAM-Probability: *
X-Rspamd-Score: 0.16 / 15.00 / 15.00
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 82ED717E2
X-Rspamd-UID: 45ee1a
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 16:50:38 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] An alternative to BIP 32?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 10:17:01 -0000
On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 20:46 +0100, vjudeu via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> is it safe enough to implement it and use in practice?
This may be harsh but I can assure you that a HD wallet scheme that can
be specified in 3 lines (without even specifying what the security
goals are) should not be assumed safe to implement.
Tim
|
