1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1W6chw-00044r-9I
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:05:48 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.149.56 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.149.56; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail149056.authsmtp.com;
Received: from outmail149056.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.56])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1W6chu-0002La-A1 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:05:48 +0000
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt17.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s0O95d3E097507;
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:05:39 GMT
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s0O95WZa053234
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:05:35 GMT
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:05:32 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <20140124090532.GB15398@savin>
References: <CAJna-HjGHpru6Lpv_tXUkWR2mX-=fobzojtHYvSRJy6+CMesOA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANg-TZCrpT-YJ0WV9VY6w-PtCiz2YRMBCMvmjneDz13j2namkw@mail.gmail.com>
<20140120223502.GA1055@petertodd.org>
<CANOOu=_pVCPiDtbqc3EwToZWzjLw4UqOvpsu2Wrt4eDKC7g_2g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJna-HgStwQQUiNZfJrFS1SduuzEEVrF=qmVe23uqZUNhHkOHA@mail.gmail.com>
<52DDB8AB.4010103@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52DDB8AB.4010103@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: afbc67be-84d6-11e3-94fa-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAYUElQaAgsB AmIbW11eUFh7WmY7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
WVdMSlVNFUsrAWMI A3l0Axl3dAdFfDB4 YkZkECENDhd8chQo
X0ZQQWsbZGY1a30W VBYJagNUcgZDfk5E aVUrVz1vNG8XDQg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCWwqJmZk HEFQVRsuG0QBDy46 KxhO
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1W6chu-0002La-A1
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP0039: Final call
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 09:05:48 -0000
--1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:00:43AM +0100, Thomas Voegtlin wrote:
> Hi slush,
>=20
> Thank you for your new proposal; it seems to be a compromise.
>=20
> @Christophe Biocca:
> If the wordlist becomes part of the standard, then we will run into
> problems of collisions once users ask for wordlists in every language.
>=20
> IMO the right approach is to implement checksums that do not depend
> on the wordlist (eg the 'brute force' method, Hash(mnemonic||1) mod
> 2^k =3D=3D 0 )
> this would also allow us to implement sipa's variable stretching proposal.
>=20
> I understand this is not possible because of the computational
> requirements of devices such as trezor.
Is it? Surely the trezor can bruteforce, say, 8 bits =3D=3D 0. How many
SHA256/sec can the trezor hardware do? Generating your seed is a
one-time thing after all - that taking 10-30s doesn't seem like a big
deal to me.
Even a 1/256th "checksum" will really cut down on the number of mistakes
made and money lost.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000001d8b9d438c18e856735ddae5b1d918416010350d19794aab6
--1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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==
=eGcy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG--
|
