summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a6/bc92919e2d00d25f842e1dd653b8f1fde69c01
blob: 1b5a05f64fb656871716af3bb1192e67252d770a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1Yz9ES-0005Nc-CX
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 31 May 2015 19:49:16 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.215.52; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-la0-f52.google.com; 
Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Yz9EO-0001Mb-EL
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 31 May 2015 19:49:16 +0000
Received: by laei3 with SMTP id i3so295387lae.3
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 31 May 2015 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.166.37 with SMTP id zd5mr17416024lbb.75.1433101746038;
	Sun, 31 May 2015 12:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.90.75 with HTTP; Sun, 31 May 2015 12:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1433079085.5422.10.camel@yahoo.com>
References: <554BE0E1.5030001@bluematt.me>
	<CAFzgq-xByQ1E_33_m3UpXQFUkGc78HKnA=7XXMshANDuTkNsvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T0kbRe31LMwk499MQUw225f5GGd67GfhXBezHmDqxkioA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFzgq-z5WCznGhbOexS0XESNGAVauw45ewEV-1eMij7yDT61=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFzgq-zTybEQyGz0nq90u5n5JZcJzxQS_XKaTpr5POJi-tHM6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T37jE3AtmUOOuW+emLGTparbS6OozPRL_hCrC+2JEzxgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1433079085.5422.10.camel@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 15:49:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T3UXCeh_-5bpKiF53+9LrufN596LnFyRq4fqN7PcVq7jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: gb <kiwigb@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c382d07feeb00517660045
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1Yz9EO-0001Mb-EL
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [Bulk] Re: Fwd: Block Size Increase
	Requirements
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 19:49:16 -0000

--001a11c382d07feeb00517660045
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:31 AM, gb <kiwigb@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Aren't you calculating bandwidth for a singly-connected node? A "highly
> connected" miner could have 30-100 node connections so you probably need
> to increase your traffic estimates by that factor.
>
> I.e. For 100MB blocks, 30-100 Mbps and $60-$100 per day data costs.
>

No, randomly connected gossip networks (which is what the Bitcoin p2p
network is) don't work that way, bandwidth is (roughly) O(N) where N is the
number of bytes relayed to everybody.

(it is actually a small multiple of N, because of the overhead of 'inv'
messages, and if we ever get really serious about scaling up we'll need to
fix the protocol to reduce that overhead, but that won't be a problem for
years).


-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--001a11c382d07feeb00517660045
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
un, May 31, 2015 at 9:31 AM, gb <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:kiw=
igb@yahoo.com" target=3D"_blank">kiwigb@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=3D":1rq" class=3D"a3s" style=3D"over=
flow:hidden">Aren&#39;t you calculating bandwidth for a singly-connected no=
de? A &quot;highly<br>
connected&quot; miner could have 30-100 node connections so you probably ne=
ed<br>
to increase your traffic estimates by that factor.<br>
<br>
I.e. For 100MB blocks, 30-100 Mbps and $60-$100 per day data costs.<br></di=
v></blockquote></div><br>No, randomly connected gossip networks (which is w=
hat the Bitcoin p2p network is) don&#39;t work that way, bandwidth is (roug=
hly) O(N) where N is the number of bytes relayed to everybody.</div><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">(it is actually a =
small multiple of N, because of the overhead of &#39;inv&#39; messages, and=
 if we ever get really serious about scaling up we&#39;ll need to fix the p=
rotocol to reduce that overhead, but that won&#39;t be a problem for years)=
.<br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class=3D"gmail_signature"=
>--<br>Gavin Andresen<br></div>
</div></div>

--001a11c382d07feeb00517660045--