summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a3/f808a1e941a7900f1bf5aabd180c3a589c5169
blob: c013ed81fb1deb16ab93856f4ab913130d500bd9 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>) id 1WhVoG-0003Nw-OV
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 06 May 2014 03:12:48 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of riseup.net
	designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=198.252.153.129;
	envelope-from=odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net;
	helo=mx1.riseup.net; 
Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WhVoF-0002i9-Lp
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 06 May 2014 03:12:48 +0000
Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "*.riseup.net",
	Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
	by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B41550162;
	Mon,  5 May 2014 20:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(Authenticated sender: odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net)
	with ESMTPSA id F0D872D8
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1)
	(SquirrelMail authenticated user odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net)
	by fulvetta.riseup.net with HTTP; Mon, 5 May 2014 20:12:41 -0700
Message-ID: <da34991a7a2db8f6f15401ed614cfe1e.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACUQsLJwNo=GtcozCRpZU9PDDJE1fY-mnMomCUtf0WCsgGEnfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACUQsLJwNo=GtcozCRpZU9PDDJE1fY-mnMomCUtf0WCsgGEnfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 20:12:41 -0700
From: odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net
To: "Srintuar" <srintuar@gmail.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.1 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [198.252.153.129 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay
	lines
X-Headers-End: 1WhVoF-0002i9-Lp
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug in key.cpp
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 03:12:48 -0000

You are right there is a bug in there.

But the value is not 25% I think.  Tinker some more. :-)

> I think i see a bug:
>
> line 273 of key.cpp
>
>         if (rec<0 || rec>=3D3)
>             return false;
>
> Afaict, 3 is a perfectly valid value, meaning 25% of sig-> key recoveri=
es
> would fail erroneously...
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
> Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find
> out:
> &#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
> &#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
> &#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce___________________________________________=
____
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>