1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB15AC97
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Aug 2018 23:58:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149084.authsmtp.net (outmail149084.authsmtp.net
[62.13.149.84])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28892735
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 5 Aug 2018 23:58:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
by punt21.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w75NwKxR089170;
Mon, 6 Aug 2018 00:58:20 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from pete@petertodd.org)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w75NwIBx027884
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 6 Aug 2018 00:58:19 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from pete@petertodd.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B1DD40154;
Sun, 5 Aug 2018 23:58:13 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 23:57:55 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAK6DEspS1+LWwJgbVfWaM3gHwmhYPGBuV+dLPATe--QwmUUa2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK6DEspS1+LWwJgbVfWaM3gHwmhYPGBuV+dLPATe--QwmUUa2Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Autocrypt: addr=pete@petertodd.org; keydata=mQENBE+Xo6MBCACpPhm2zLk6G65vB8Of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To: lautaro.dragan@gmail.com, Lautaro Dragan <lautarodragan@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Lautaro Dragan via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Message-ID: <F6AA346D-4AF5-4838-A91F-44FAF74A55E9@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: 6da728d8-990b-11e8-9efd-0015176ca198
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdgQUGUATAgsB Am4bW1ReVVV7WGo7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUwJtf1t4 dFYeUB56fwEIeXxy YU8sWCQKW0ZyIU5g
S0dUR3AHZDJodWlK BhRFdwNVdQJNeEwU a1l3GhFYa3VsNCMk
FAgyOXU9MCtqYA9R SwAILFQdCU8NVhkE cCovIQgVOwU9XSg9 LgxO
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Claiming an OP_RETURN Prefix
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 23:58:24 -0000
On August 5, 2018 9:11:26 PM UTC, Lautaro Dragan via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-=
dev@lists=2Elinuxfoundation=2Eorg> wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>My name's Lautaro and I'm currently acting as Tech Lead of Po=2Eet
><https://en=2Ebitcoin=2Eit/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes>=2E At Po=2E=
et we
>use
>colored coins
><https://github=2Ecom/poetapp/node/blob/3c905bc5dbd3722ad39ac68041d9f2a09=
9e5e84c/src/BlockchainWriter/ClaimController=2Ets#L101-L110>
>to
>store data on the Bitcoin blockchain with prefix "POET"=2E
>
>I've read in an old version of the OP_RETURN entry of the bitcoin wiki
><https://en=2Ebitcoin=2Eit/w/index=2Ephp?title=3DOP_RETURN&oldid=3D62560>=
that
>*protocols
>wishing to claim OP_RETURN prefixes should use the standard Bitcoin
>Improvement Proposals process*=2E
>
>That entry seems to have changed recently
><https://en=2Ebitcoin=2Eit/wiki/OP_RETURN#OP_RETURN_prefixes>, no longer
>stating that we should follow the BIP process, and I haven't been able
>to
>find any existing BIP claiming an OP_RETURN prexif, but for the sake of
>thoroughness I'd like to ask for your help or confirmation here=2E
>
>Should we actually be using the BIP process to claim a prefix?
It's better if you don't use a prefix at all from a censorship resistance =
and anonymity perspective; you're application should not require a prefix f=
or technical reasons=2E
--=20
https://petertodd=2Eorg 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd=2Eorg
|
