1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1W2nv0-0003mx-Tc
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:15:30 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.149.75 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.149.75; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail149075.authsmtp.net;
Received: from outmail149075.authsmtp.net ([62.13.149.75])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1W2nuz-0002eo-E7 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:15:30 +0000
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt14.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s0DKFMIm044962;
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:15:22 GMT
Received: from petertodd.org (petertodd.org [174.129.28.249])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s0DKFAQK079452
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:15:12 GMT
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:15:10 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140113201509.GC7941@petertodd.org>
References: <20140106120338.GA14918@savin>
<op.w9c5o7vgyldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
<20140110102037.GB25749@savin>
<op.w9kkxcityldrnw@laptop-air.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
<CABsx9T2G=yqSUGr0+Ju5-z9P++uS20AwLC+c3DnFMHtcQjQK6w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgTz0TaGhym_35V3N2-vHVzU9BeuV8q+QJjwh5bg77FEZg@mail.gmail.com>
<20140113194049.GJ38964@giles.gnomon.org.uk>
<CANAnSg30V01B_3LCJ09sTwcsYa4_WOg3sKd-=p6COZS6w0b-uA@mail.gmail.com>
<52D4458C.6010909@gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgTzVWUF_B_-1jkRs3WZ8Um_CcHeH7uFU0eLncgEqQ01HQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTzVWUF_B_-1jkRs3WZ8Um_CcHeH7uFU0eLncgEqQ01HQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 68e7ef20-7c8f-11e3-94fa-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdwEUElQaAgsB AmIbWVReUVh7WGA7 ag1VcwRfa1RMVxto
VEFWR1pVCwQmQhx1 fWhvM2JycAxCfXw+ ZEZiWHQVWkwvchMr
QE5JEj4OM3phaTUc TUlcIVJJcANIexZF O1F8UScOLwdSbGoL
NQ4vNDcwO3BTJTpY RgYVKF8UXXNDJSIx ThQeHX0GEUEfSj4o IgdO
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 174.129.28.249/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1W2nuz-0002eo-E7
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Stealth Addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:15:31 -0000
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:10:56PM -0800, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> Uh while I'm responding again, what I'd discussed with Peter Todd in
> IRC used two EC points in the stealth address. One for the payment and
> one for the ECDH. The reason to use two is that it makes delegating
> detection possible and so you don't have to have you spending keys
> online to even detect these payments. Why'd that get dropped?
I mentioned it again in another email; I just forgot to include it in my
final write-up.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000023d5a8bbe131414328a6c50a2741933ba03775afd3c3db395
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJS1ElNAAoJEBmcgzuo5/CFOqgIAMwGJ5iAza5QI4IxKVFXWmtg
RTldONbsfAA+ZIvQQ/CQ/4BmdldUyCuHL8o/91HdE7xHM96BAYE+RbX5nOxRAUCT
91XHQvetIZlhtVO4YrLq/tS8iQ576TBrFmgNAjB1P97E2XCGUixR5OceFSEENqUl
ISOYxzKT0NH92UD8O1XXRN0IBnOlO+6WFuhzsfLQ5rDcHYbc2RvMShMBBAGu96vn
lAZU86+MfRfiqvL9BvesHkJcGpprHyRfYzKgfi4nBOF6gAgr+IivtpI1m9GCKwsx
U0n6amlY3coFcieCA2hOnuxc7gr5nqa3HcrejRhA2vMqqr6zHaiFJ/0DDUcM4b4=
=jRjy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--
|
