summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a3/07e0c92cfd5429e206e2514dd9f48da540b748
blob: dfdcf527b620d23cd847ca2677c86ecb154e7d14 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1SPZdP-00063y-5z
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 02 May 2012 13:30:23 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.212.47; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-vb0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.212.47])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1SPZdJ-0001nC-R1
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 02 May 2012 13:30:23 +0000
Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so531965vbb.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 02 May 2012 06:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.210.20 with SMTP id gi20mr28633097vcb.42.1335965412353;
	Wed, 02 May 2012 06:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.107.69 with HTTP; Wed, 2 May 2012 06:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP17H-E0mWGGjNS2i0079LuRJ9MnVHSPjR_ots2LR7j9bA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1335808239.18613.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CALf2ePwm9_aGngzVTKte+3_+yHF=-pcNqTAO0hmkR5rcimEX3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<1335810663.39838.YahooMailNeo@web121007.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
	<CALf2ePx_+SaANDfvyuTpv=M8rquvjAqSGV5+Uo=wkYKb-oOrLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP17H-E0mWGGjNS2i0079LuRJ9MnVHSPjR_ots2LR7j9bA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 09:30:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTAymMon2cunZXZr6zrbZJzSL=fZ=OehKwS=ONsABB8_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1SPZdJ-0001nC-R1
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] new bitcoin.org clients page
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 13:30:23 -0000

> If your computer is low powered or you aren't willing to tolerate a 24-ho=
ur+ initial start time,

What computer is the initial start time 24-hours+ now?   On normal
systems initial sync-up now takes a couple hours.  It could be slower,
of course, if you have the bad luck to end up with unresponsive peers=E2=80=
=94
but that will also make the SPV nodes slow.

Better to be conservative I agree, but calling it a dozen times longer
than I'd expect is perhaps a bit much.

Refine refine refine.