summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a2/2648e184f55be941cb81c67dde6de8b8e08f33
blob: 3bfb82caf53246cb9f847e52865518f431ebfa49 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1WX9zL-0003In-Sq
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:53:27 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.217.182 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.217.182; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-lb0-f182.google.com; 
Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com ([209.85.217.182])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WX9zL-00006W-41
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:53:27 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n15so4720986lbi.41
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 07 Apr 2014 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.131.34 with SMTP id oj2mr1694766lbb.43.1396878800433;
	Mon, 07 Apr 2014 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.89.68 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 06:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSZS=hkL=ztNrNVawGbcvO+5iGQ36peC5zBosZ8aCWepg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP2rgiQHpekEpFviJ22QsiV+s-F2pqosaZOA5WrRtJx5pg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAAS2fgSZS=hkL=ztNrNVawGbcvO+5iGQ36peC5zBosZ8aCWepg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 06:53:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQxgRjCYEynXmZxMsYkohudBZN7jyJ1hOTft82ppKCQ1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
	1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
	[Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?209.85.217.182>]
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	1.5 SF_NO_SPF_SPAM         SF_NO_SPF_SPAM
X-Headers-End: 1WX9zL-00006W-41
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Why are we bleeding nodes?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:53:28 -0000

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW, A few months before that we had even less than 8500 by the bitnodes count.

Gah, accidentally send.... I wanted to continue here that it was less
than 8500 and had been falling pretty consistently for months,
basically since the bitcoin.org change.  Unfortunately it looks like
the old bitnodes.io data isn't available anymore, so I'm going off my
memory here.

The Bitnodes counts have always been somewhat higher than my or sipa's
node counts too, fwiw.