summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a1/585e03c4258c8a5dc02d5a86ecb0dc65e5888f
blob: 6810766c8f90c1d8cd38de6c6d5c16b5d395290a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
Return-Path: <junderwood@bitcoinbank.co.jp>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87AAB6C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:06:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-yw1-f48.google.com (mail-yw1-f48.google.com
	[209.85.161.48])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58433D0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:06:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw1-f48.google.com with SMTP id r199so2477732ywe.4
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 16 Nov 2018 06:06:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=bitcoinbank.co.jp; s=google;
	h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc; bh=xJmHcBAAVbAaE8EkpXGUC2naY+YOxfso3dz+8oduCfU=;
	b=M/FWVzqBdRl6A3+/FrTBWuLMulpYN51B7zNeUk7jh92wn3fAuxRT5gfUEXSZdIqMga
	ZGiXANTC326psActBAlSEWhqkROWbp9E5vfuq/LQaD39iEmjo2HG90JvUKXdbakmASGY
	74+i+cnahwiXb3jZjiFC4OcdsD44bnApLSvbmeNwYV0YN3m0B9RLi7+h3Yf7iaw2L++1
	hxA/KZXiuc5pKmP+qv6/z3Izt1MnSaYv0fG5Izk94DR9DPhX1jiLfe4QGcwa1gyO9/1P
	iJ6c5CLeakikSPHnroBUNiTygSM2EMZhLcYxyicb4HQfhypA2B0alcGpn+v2BnGUG9LY
	Y+3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:cc;
	bh=xJmHcBAAVbAaE8EkpXGUC2naY+YOxfso3dz+8oduCfU=;
	b=fbrWpFKdKVsIBfjAO57lNHemLjnyWH0ZXkZzgwtspgmhmzjq7wRaGx2pCIsALv31PE
	ws2FbTT6DcsuEptElipLI8fwoGgN3v+RmWjXBHOiyFii544MuA0Jlu54UhCCqc+KdgMK
	dbRYXXmV4BfUPFiDP/h+Qrj1SV33XAS73/HnFx1DJ0KJ5fjb20weVd3sxiFvniIfid3v
	zSwz70XTbLL0tZq1MADk0yiQ1MdeWIdxjGOKqaG5WuCHt8n1/Sn0JbG+6EgBlDz2cb9W
	O/RrjLHQDdALmF1sgZ8airTJWbwJVdv71PczLOvn4LlZYZdN1rvfinO/LJzrz1E775bc
	Wb6w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIfRxn0qhMwfKa1reJjS0wZMT7En8OXTCBKNTlaNn9+uIlymfNM
	0+c2NqsC/7DYeGDtnuXlQxQDFX4rOdi+YaSqOfaE
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5etql7nlYyldoOYQNi4wejPAy+sA/McPu3qpvKAPjvuaSikfnXh8qsSU7PEPZlL3yx9/nLiCspews36Isc8XOQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:cbd1:: with SMTP id n200mr6614404ywd.63.1542377162906; 
	Fri, 16 Nov 2018 06:06:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <bANNM0nNJ1cJdrNjvBZfx6O-zwAQ_bg4qPgoYCQGGNQxc0I4AHF0nQCqPYGqYQzLMP07URApaPCOBBPC4whZ77M8amvUdfIo3TFhQjpzNpY=@protonmail.com>
	<CAMpN3m+Zo6LG1wCkW7tLZy7VzpF8YpjHQqq7StO78C0P-8y0Ew@mail.gmail.com>
	<20181116140335.GA11584@boiler.chaos.net>
In-Reply-To: <20181116140335.GA11584@boiler.chaos.net>
From: Jonathan Underwood <junderwood@bitcoinbank.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 23:05:50 +0900
Message-ID: <CAMpN3mLRUD+cobNHtK=5dCL2hpGZJaR2TYzKb_643BC-wM5feQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Neill Miller <neillm@thecodefactory.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7d62d057ac8aa5f"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:22:00 +0000
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, somber.night@protonmail.com
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP- & SLIP-0039 -- better multi-language support
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 14:06:05 -0000

--000000000000e7d62d057ac8aa5f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Nope.

This is how Electrum treats BIP39 restoring as well, try it out.

-Jon

2018=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8816=E6=97=A5(=E9=87=91) 23:04=E3=80=81Neill Miller =
=E3=81=95=E3=82=93=EF=BC=88neillm@thecodefactory.org=EF=BC=89=E3=81=AE=E3=
=83=A1=E3=83=83=E3=82=BB=E3=83=BC=E3=82=B8:

> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:17:30PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood via
> bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > If more apps would implement to the word of the BIP39 spec, multiple
> > languages make sense, but since reality is no one follows the spec (/th=
e
> > spec is way too open to interpretation) then expecting every app to loa=
d
> > every language is unreasonable.
> >
> > Electrum actually handles BIP39 recovery the way the BIP specifies. I c=
an
> > restore random strings if I want, and it warns me, and I can ignore it
> if I
> > wish.
>
> Electrum mnemonics are not based on BIP39, which is why it can do
> this.
>
> -Neill.
>
>

--000000000000e7d62d057ac8aa5f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">Nope.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">This i=
s how Electrum treats BIP39 restoring as well, try it out.</div><div dir=3D=
"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">-Jon</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote"><div dir=3D"ltr">2018=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8816=E6=97=A5(=E9=87=91) 23:0=
4=E3=80=81Neill Miller =E3=81=95=E3=82=93=EF=BC=88<a href=3D"mailto:neillm@=
thecodefactory.org">neillm@thecodefactory.org</a>=EF=BC=89=E3=81=AE=E3=83=
=A1=E3=83=83=E3=82=BB=E3=83=BC=E3=82=B8:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left=
:1ex">On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 02:17:30PM +0900, Jonathan Underwood via bitc=
oin-dev wrote:<br>
&gt; If more apps would implement to the word of the BIP39 spec, multiple<b=
r>
&gt; languages make sense, but since reality is no one follows the spec (/t=
he<br>
&gt; spec is way too open to interpretation) then expecting every app to lo=
ad<br>
&gt; every language is unreasonable.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Electrum actually handles BIP39 recovery the way the BIP specifies. I =
can<br>
&gt; restore random strings if I want, and it warns me, and I can ignore it=
 if I<br>
&gt; wish.<br>
<br>
Electrum mnemonics are not based on BIP39, which is why it can do<br>
this.<br>
<br>
-Neill.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000e7d62d057ac8aa5f--