summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/9f/ea1a49503c182a2e5ff538487416954c62805e
blob: 1bf8847d9470efbc96b165bf2875efd77f39558e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
Return-Path: <dave@dtrt.org>
Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4716DC0177
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 22 Mar 2020 07:55:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E502887B3
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 22 Mar 2020 07:55:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from hemlock.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id E-QBaRSgwhyK
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 22 Mar 2020 07:55:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from newmail.dtrt.org (li1228-87.members.linode.com [45.79.129.87])
 by hemlock.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63AD3887AF
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 22 Mar 2020 07:55:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from harding by newmail.dtrt.org with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <dave@dtrt.org>)
 id 1jFvSF-0002C8-Fi; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 03:55:31 -0400
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 03:54:15 -0400
From: "David A. Harding" <dave@dtrt.org>
To: Dave Scotese <dscotese@litmocracy.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20200322075415.3xttkgldluzqyv4g@ganymede>
References: <CAGLBAhcS5oxGvrcG7QdO7Ya6X2n1=H_nzx5Eh=69rcje6SQpgA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ntdwhc3n4dq6vcvj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGLBAhcS5oxGvrcG7QdO7Ya6X2n1=H_nzx5Eh=69rcje6SQpgA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block solving slowdown question/poll
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 07:55:34 -0000


--ntdwhc3n4dq6vcvj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:40:24AM -0700, Dave Scotese via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> [Imagine] we also see mining power dropping off at a rate that
> suggests the few days [until retarget] might become a few weeks, and
> then, possibly, a few months or even the unthinkable, a few eons.  I'm
> curious to know if anyone has ideas on how this might be handled

There are only two practical solutions I'm aware of:

1. Do nothing
2. Hard fork a difficulty reduction

If bitcoins retain even a small fraction of their value compared to the
previous retarget period and if most mining equipment is still available
for operation, then doing nothing is probably the best choice---as block
space becomes scarcer, transaction feerates will increase and miners
will be incentivized to increase their block production rate.

If the bitcoin price has plummeted more than, say, 99% in two weeks
with no hope of short-term recovery or if a large fraction of mining
equipment has become unusable (again, say, 99% in two weeks with no
hope of short-term recovery), then it's probably worth Bitcoin users
discussing a hard fork to reduce difficulty to a currently sustainable
level.

-Dave

--ntdwhc3n4dq6vcvj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WwX/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ntdwhc3n4dq6vcvj--