1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <bip@mattwhitlock.name>) id 1WWO1k-00038Q-GI
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:40:44 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.64])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1WWO1h-0002jK-TT for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:40:44 +0000
Received: from omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44])
by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id mAgK1n0010xGWP857Agck8; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:40:36 +0000
Received: from crushinator.localnet ([IPv6:2601:6:4800:47f:219:d1ff:fe75:dc2f])
by omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id mAga1n00W4VnV2P3YAgb6H; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:40:36 +0000
From: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
To: Jorge =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 06:40:33 -0400
Message-ID: <1750679.2ZqEPETxMv@crushinator>
User-Agent: KMail/4.12.4 (Linux/3.12.13-gentoo; KDE/4.12.4; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAC1+kJPUxNn0iSz=c3OTCFS26sg2jxS-goUdE7LSKphtE9owKw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBh1_mYH4JNv1xTFnLsoC=qzmgi0QaLAyd7YeQ=wZQBDSQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0P9SmynBfJ94A1js30j2OsC0PeEhEy-n+6Wa2Sogo+TNw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC1+kJPUxNn0iSz=c3OTCFS26sg2jxS-goUdE7LSKphtE9owKw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [76.96.62.64 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WWO1h-0002jK-TT
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:40:44 -0000
On Saturday, 5 April 2014, at 12:21 pm, Jorge Tim=F3n wrote:
> I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY and =
YYYY-DD-MM.
Your preferences reflect a cultural bias. The only entirely numeric dat=
e format that is unambiguous across all cultures is YYYY-MM-DD. (No cul=
ture uses YYYY-DD-MM, or at least the ISO seems to think so.)
|
