1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A60D70
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 8 Mar 2016 06:09:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com
[209.85.223.172])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B34F7EE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 8 Mar 2016 06:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id g203so14886689iof.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:09:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
:from:to; bh=Q35h/8l0UEN5CSjoaQNsBwrANeKotJQgAcefZkacPUQ=;
b=LQAFL/Y13o3ld/VYY+MQbTAuS06Lv/SHy/bz6F7O747jeC8HZuNzsIsnKFFSwjC9tk
fCdofqL/YROOESEVxRLVLsPafliyZxvUnE5Mhf1q9XhF3dmYnRj6bTqBFxw2hTSeHgeg
oVilDwX0Tyyo0/GK1XR0fctReBQmL+Oz6FTKo/0boB4ksJhOjOvrAQJBlcJsyEqgJjds
YdiMrIldV0QDJvJFbhyaqtB/F4HwSBNf3uAf5KAENHnnu/3txcJ1hlI+jXnGyXvAq23T
+7PwPqENi2I0/5StrsbjNjvxVFKaYQh6GBFKjLlxeg9O3jpaGR1rnY8W49riW1prB/VJ
bAqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to;
bh=Q35h/8l0UEN5CSjoaQNsBwrANeKotJQgAcefZkacPUQ=;
b=GQhCLn5B4Re6a1k0Ih/sA7hisbh3e1hUFz1NBr2wR0Tz0E3WwsxIMdpu/L8yfMxpQj
1ukWmL8DaSAPW0/rAAjX63y3XZquwwVAXTWH4Msx52/ywhBzWzW9lceLHrz591sQFzwg
LxhZ4q4rVO4k1uLjX5VFs7YzNjDv1WhN1prGNitAecKYKFUpiC0ndhjlYG0c4X/QkVys
rVs7SrfK+4L7wgTI0ZV2jPy0WffG+3JRoZK59AcWeGJkTxhFeJgiXUKE7LU2Y64tfXje
6fbYnD18OY7E5E9mqjOWqLCFXxH39sjxOVVWP6djcAqCWvM18RVdq+If4MVwfzb7RewM
uwTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIeVEVUhF92KD77XEBBsQAmwaj82SzUEronIfjiVOb1TLdgU0U+GEmNeoq4P2hszfYCc9i1eVN8pmaw3w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.14.196 with SMTP id 187mr25300884ioo.134.1457417393246;
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:09:53 -0800 (PST)
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.198.6 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:09:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSf_qYaT7ahQTbmRoQpG57qgF26NKVuGGaEzpMZmCOFoA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHUwRvuR9qtYc+rVh1yPbQoESxm4m0r6a+Fd6VF=FuT0vom_HQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQi1X4v9WxT1pnd_XSyE2b8hUZUv0z5A8cOEvw5RztOKw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGLBAheY-LWy1YjOZz9+-M3O0jO5H3iyogdXzBaXrnj6KGjY8A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSf_qYaT7ahQTbmRoQpG57qgF26NKVuGGaEzpMZmCOFoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 06:09:53 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: AMhI3eSMHu-cl9qQ5W7zHtaZSgw
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgQxWi=vTov3NiNsEzvAU1eDDdH1p2M=7wf5Qw6g1Az_3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 06:56:55 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Services bit for xthin blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 06:09:54 -0000
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 06:09:54 -0000
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Dave Scotese <dscotese@litmocracy.com> wrote:
> I think a BIP is a good idea, but rather than making such a specific
> proposal as "Let's use bit 4 to indicate communication of thin blocks," how
> about a more general one like "Let's use bit(s?) 4(-5?) as user-agent
Not communicated in address messages, so useless for discovery.
I think any feature which could do this could use the BIP130 approach instead.
|
