1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@exmulti.com>) id 1QwIZS-0001TE-OB
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:53:02 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1QwIZR-0007BE-RL
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:53:02 +0000
Received: by iyf13 with SMTP id 13so2700329iyf.30
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.244.202 with SMTP id lr10mr4848107icb.227.1314211558879;
Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.50.200 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [99.43.178.25]
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T12R2dd=Ak7k4N+ZVAyLvJnx9oS0vVjwRa5T+UoCjbEMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T1uw43JuvhEmJP0KCyojsDi1r7v6BaLBHz7wWazduE5iw@mail.gmail.com>
<201108241215.36847.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAAS2fgQspsXy1Vw=fNr1FvsDRkEbP6dEcFLgUpK9DrBKXyiWNg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJ1JLtsxPG9v-Hwdb-pfgY6GU0Z4it+frFzw_tObVbNC6Xgdjw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgTARAMqMu79Sp4XS4KxmUBWiXebpavHWr-EdLZbxS=sTw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJ1JLttqEnCjALadESmpntxSobD8Lj1zcXL4S7ghqdhyBrwVNw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T12R2dd=Ak7k4N+ZVAyLvJnx9oS0vVjwRa5T+UoCjbEMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:45:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+8xBpefWGE02SWRe=6GdNKc1jwdDQu-HEvDiEF_pw2XLX_7rQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1QwIZR-0007BE-RL
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New standard transaction types: time to
schedule a blockchain split?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:53:02 -0000
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> w=
rote:
> This discussion is convincing me that scheduling a blockchain split is
> definitely the wrong idea at this time. =A0We can revisit in N months,
Strongly agreed...
--=20
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com
|
