1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jtimon@monetize.io>) id 1VqMyd-000065-NK
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:03:51 +0000
Received: from mail-ve0-f170.google.com ([209.85.128.170])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VqMyc-00054z-6a
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:03:51 +0000
Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id oy12so4869032veb.29
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 05:03:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=AZnQODXsyAJu+wnpy15t4aQ+AIpfPXTh56f3hDauWEY=;
b=Ff108tdCKJMG5ljkK4tCs8ghnTnvBpvlPZpDAFB69doM9G2l9Bv9QYLqi66B3c30dM
KMwZjGH4wRP4gPwjUOnRxvW2M38eUauFHLjgy/o/Dir0wPbyEXGYKt9sG7yuwcQarZeq
o6sFs0MbAhlq/Lf2hXYaUqUIL6KKPkFjfQiidEYtI1S/U2Tk12/mFdCUmPsKr+uGP6xh
NejmJIsDhyzILBJE1HAvZ3ztqXV92h6QDhztsXS8wggFH/CtFtCoVvYq6lUA7IBx1IUO
hoKs6YNSMkZDEmWfVQMe69rcbWeGAnWtppwkCiErEVdHgqa8ZmgjS7qoiE3CYNj+qXT6
TeSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlOGsR/c1q0kVzznuDGCtb0kja7p5Zf7r3bCDjP0P/GuT3DhxMeiqtQoWf6BWxlwDSjvxSB
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.53.9.201 with SMTP id du9mr530813vdd.36.1386679119096; Tue,
10 Dec 2013 04:38:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.221.22.69 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:38:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [85.53.148.91]
In-Reply-To: <CAO7N=i3wb0cmoaTsQSrMhezgsGqCxzK-AzAF22LU0UpBLcqiUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO7N=i1p=7fGgzJXvctRoGTsztP6f9rqs78s9=Vnc3TC0RVLdA@mail.gmail.com>
<20131209221130.GA22556@shavo.dd-wrt>
<CAO7N=i0Y=sKXa=djc+8652e_0NiWLyMA9hrXyddaS+gOTu0yxQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0MXzQoSso+ZdXsNf7nzBe=6tCsq0CNrbF6waFxV2moWiQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAO7N=i3wb0cmoaTsQSrMhezgsGqCxzK-AzAF22LU0UpBLcqiUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:38:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC1+kJNbSn_3p9Pu_geyb0nYhE10mLkpJ1o-4BzR-w2p5e_5pQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
To: Ryan Carboni <ryan.jc.pc@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information. [URIs: freico.in]
X-Headers-End: 1VqMyc-00054z-6a
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>, bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Monetary Authority for Bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:03:51 -0000
On 12/10/13, Ryan Carboni <ryan.jc.pc@gmail.com> wrote:
> You're just closed minded.
No, at least to persons have explained you why your proposal is not feasibl=
e.
If you wanted to learn, you would have made questions on why those
parts of your proposal are unfeasible.
There have been many proposals about "stablecoins" in bitcointalk and
other forums (for example, the "initial proposals" freicoin subforum).
I have participated in several of them trying to find a solution and
I'm now convinced that this is impossible to implement in a secure AND
P2P system.
This is off-topic for this forum, specially if (as you've shown to us)
you are not interested in learning why this proposal is unfeasible.
--=20
Jorge Tim=F3n
http://freico.in/
|
