1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org>)
id 1VOmLN-0001uk-MW for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:29:17 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org
designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender)
client-ip=80.91.229.3;
envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org;
helo=plane.gmane.org;
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VOmLJ-0007Qm-FB
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:29:17 +0000
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org>)
id 1VOmLB-0007mJ-Ik for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:29:05 +0200
Received: from e179079149.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.179.79.149])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:29:05 +0200
Received: from andreas by e179079149.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1
(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:29:05 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
From: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:28:53 +0200
Message-ID: <l1udst$uos$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CABsx9T0Ly67ZNJhoRQk0L9Q0-ucq3e=24b5Tg6GRKspRKKtP-g@mail.gmail.com> <521298F0.20108@petersson.at> <CABsx9T3b--tfUmaxJxsXyM2f3Cw4M1oX1nX8o9WkW_haBmLctA@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP2BOWk4FOUx4eVHvXmdSgx3zo_o18J8YBi2Uc_WkBAXKA@mail.gmail.com> <CANEZrP0H9TVfQ3AGv6aBmS1DUa6MTWhSFAN1Jo4eimBEBQhPZw@mail.gmail.com> <CABsx9T0TQ6Gg=muNP-rCZxan8_nAqeJt6ErYVOfnLJKrsLs81w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP2V72+-m-FOCsW3C2GBO7+=-0casKadeHncmNTYjyqJRA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e179079149.adsl.alicedsl.de
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2V72+-m-FOCsW3C2GBO7+=-0casKadeHncmNTYjyqJRA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
1.1 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature,
domain signs all mail
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-2.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
X-Headers-End: 1VOmLJ-0007Qm-FB
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol: BIP 70, 71, 72
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:29:17 -0000
While it's good to save space, I'm at the moment not convinced that
taking a de-route via an URL is a good idea to begin with.
The main problem is trust. If you scan a QR code from a foreign phone,
you trust that that phone is owned by the one you want to send money to.
By adding the HTTP request that trust is voided.
As soon as there is a BIP70 implementation, I will begin playing with
putting the payment request directly into the QR code.
On 09/25/2013 11:27 AM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> We could also say that if protocol part (https://) is missing, it's
> implied automatically. So just:
>
> bitcoin:1abc........?r=bob.com/r/aZgR <http://bob.com/r/aZgR>
>
> I think that's about as small as possible without re-using the pubkey as
> a token in the url.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com
> <mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net
> <mailto:mike@plan99.net>> wrote:
>
> BTW, on the "make qrcodes more scannable" front -- is it too
> late to change BIP 72 so the new param is just "r" instead of
> "request"? Every byte helps when it comes to qrcodes ...
>
>
> Not too late, assuming there are no objections. Smaller QR codes is
> a very good reason to change it.
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
|
