summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/9c/aed733d082c9704eac4dc3568b3837d66a720b
blob: 6f65e675d9d42351a97e0712e4f86bc36790d305 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1R1hHe-0001pq-5d
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:16:58 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=173.246.101.161;
	envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; 
Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me)
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1R1hHd-0003Jw-MK for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:16:58 +0000
Received: from [152.23.101.121] (dhcp05455.highsouth-resnet.unc.edu
	[152.23.101.121])
	by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF426EBC
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu,  8 Sep 2011 18:16:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CAK5y1FhyCCwL+w4Uo6Xht9BFkZiAmNCeywACnx=eQa6f2iFP2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK5y1FhQLWXtqHfB3HymOkZ-5LdTqdEkX8bM=nOGhFeZrOPwgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E68D968.1080604@gmail.com>
	<CAK5y1FhyCCwL+w4Uo6Xht9BFkZiAmNCeywACnx=eQa6f2iFP2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:16:51 -0400
Message-ID: <1315498611.2877.1.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1R1hHd-0003Jw-MK
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Alert System
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 16:16:58 -0000

On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 09:09 -0700, David Perry wrote:
> @Steve re "Who knows, it might be the only way we'll ever hear from
> Satoshi again."
> 
> 
> That brings up a good point... Does anyone aside from Satoshi actually
> have the ability to send such an alert?
Gavin does
> Should we at the very least change the alert system to give such
> privileges to current devs and ensure that that if the missing Mr.
> Satoshi has had his key compromised we don't see an
> authoritative-looking alert come up from a malicious source?
Meh, why make the key-holder send out two alerts for old clients and new
clients.  I also highly doubt satoshi would let his key get compromised.
That said, keep in mind they are literally just messages, they make no
functional difference.