1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
|
Return-Path: <rgrant@rgrant.org>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC89C002D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 9 Jun 2022 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F0F403F5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 9 Jun 2022 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id j-CNYQfDGwO7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 9 Jun 2022 00:03:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-vs1-f46.google.com (mail-vs1-f46.google.com
[209.85.217.46])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAC6403CA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 9 Jun 2022 00:03:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vs1-f46.google.com with SMTP id i186so21180481vsc.9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 08 Jun 2022 17:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=9Gju7g0OAF6CA2nVkOxjWtfEh/exBrpN9yXKEwabwcU=;
b=SWkN446RlPRKgaDghp5RsNe1Q8sMAD5f1vsmuBSxL2sClqZ10honDcPzrtN1bIUaPh
1x/wL7zD3TBS+xMUZSOoRst7eh2VHdGtGIY9qV6z8OwNT5qKIUZXKa7DpfURpF+29fNC
z2BdRf7V+Q7GGXSzYL2DaWK5CLZGkuoQCZbq96RHg9mTu7B5+1bMwICnT4w2oNYgOVU5
cOe6L4531GPkOhueTuNhiZ62Jq3ay6/4/v+5HwxyHqkel7sDU9BaF7dtLIuS+Mrpiwv7
1vLM2tbU9Bfri79j4uimybZJqDSxCRmnN26nE8itNXu9SYfQJg9jJAZ9LRcy5BasGas3
9PIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ThmCEKrJjIjUQy3U50WOWUIO7m4XOWJziLylUDOf5hTAutTFG
8nZxODMeJRLMAmWHgkRFu8G/A/G5z5fC0Uo47SYELAWWCUeBI1DP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzlWEzl/q9dBIlWao4DslDI2GgisG42hJGkVAdJjN1QWicGPGKcJM3QkioWbt65BQyyJTN7kxTQa//OJ3vVR3Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:1943:0:b0:34b:8b6a:2329 with SMTP id
64-20020a671943000000b0034b8b6a2329mr15879517vsz.5.1654733023074; Wed, 08 Jun
2022 17:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <QOWIpROGDv5HHP2GsDiSOsTJ9TVZhFeSP3C03_e2Z3XtOKC_4N5GJtxbdlxuhErvhLZXo1Rn_7SWAQ9XRPwHFuYyArZryTVENefDZuGTAYA=@protonmail.com>
<CABm2gDoyFUhcryx9wSx2NOWt126img+51UehtkW7Nfg2Sf97aQ@mail.gmail.com>
<zyE-uR_2M7vAE8jXf3wthIGQj_-dz9FoL50ERTmCb-MCv4zyMgoHAdSff539SPtROJpJdgrfBspM3IZJrNQ9V4kpDnyMB9X6mlWf0eSk1Rk=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <zyE-uR_2M7vAE8jXf3wthIGQj_-dz9FoL50ERTmCb-MCv4zyMgoHAdSff539SPtROJpJdgrfBspM3IZJrNQ9V4kpDnyMB9X6mlWf0eSk1Rk=@protonmail.com>
From: Ryan Grant <bitcoin-dev@rgrant.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 00:03:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMnpzfqvCuYNJRmbjN2orSZPRKcoLA+O5fjWRi=tdrSHK0wEqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin covenants are inevitable
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:03:45 -0000
I think Jorge's request for specifics is reasonable. I agree that we
can raise the level of discussion. Each claim about how good or bad a
specific BIP is should say why on the technical merits. Comments on
prior claims may expose misinformation, expose "trust me" authority,
or point out other fallacies. They should include a citation of the
original source, a fair restatement of the problematic claim for
current readers, and a short explanation of why it doesn't advance
understanding technical consensus.
There have been lots of mean comments. Some "Truth and
Reconciliation" will come due, and it will be a huge amount of work.
Another history book?
|
