1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
|
Return-Path: <adam@cypherspace.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D63E29C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0005145
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]) by
mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id
0Lkhla-1YvIxQ2irE-00aWme for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 18:05:52 +0200
Received: by iodt126 with SMTP id t126so125931461iod.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.15.209 with SMTP id 78mr15877799iop.51.1440345951932;
Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.66.101 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 09:05:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CALqxMTFixvQGTqLogDzrv0zhQFH6Z5kBdG9zwqoMuhjPvJadsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>
To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Jt3UA9qRDQnPz0/pEYB6Nz47FXlFqDF1PHu4H5LV3gk50C6YMIE
eKpqe1w34uPUarxzO1LrKGJ8qM2rzAa3sTosVmIeN5ND9C222dctSnNpvNOk/16rHjDVIO7
owqZur+fpQv2/AYoNYKBekUgXHpWjERJxxAI0jo/0yCtYBak8KFb3DUNWusQVT7DMIlTcC5
kZ7UH+k2CTPdbAphuQRag==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ICPnhlnglb8=:X7QXCl00oHcHI3femaTVnH
05zT0ChWN7Q9mr4WgdWMgPdRgNgq8wAHkMGlnLoQVV1xqzgsn3FpX/62bIXkl5cXAO3hQ7vKJ
Kt3MUqJrQTYapgwbZCTluhPz7mXSCrWaafMwaAjDJODlEuhyeXNy8hQDFoeDvimUz83sshgXV
3JZY/CtPUeNHTlhth5bTM22t1YguXNoRVazwdzqKk36F25YD7iu0EoYEKchm4fo82mF/xVCDc
MRwXqDEZWRryRqu/GI0UP9XWQoUmcWCNbj9aJHVZmYN9fZQrITJgYaBDddFhFks6NuAIXkmmH
rnAFLNEa/6YHQCQaA2JMT6mKZe4/szpWjg6rfhSPUFVeecP0uTAczqZEht06cGofi19s6EF40
w4b/I8F6/xqHisruL/T5AiF2WNNjMBMCky133C5jgccCS4jz+2VVGrykbcSBE9WydiBi3RXqq
R81xX6CkUZ338mKx9yl9DCKX67tF2PYMRpYhBmQPtfE0zPQK1W0ZeRCY9PNyZwP0pClj9lrrV
P1wXh6GswcLiTq3bpZ0ZZ0Snc4RY3Yw+nKkfiXetWDhlmvEnAffeIVOLTccIXWn0499V3tzQ7
9OHwGCfN+Gt+5QlnO3DIDDo9PqoEXDoFhPPUfSg/DaXUBJIHtn3x8nUYgACqMQ3rX4ZUnqrmM
/b6/EQEy6tkbPcnRiuVMNKCXcOU4DnuJiR9xUwNnLVgtkQHGvTFaqTd1rFVn/voMVetAoAv0i
44Vp1LmjBOmTAAct
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 10X: Replace Transaction Fees with Data,
Discussion Draft 0.2.9
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:05:55 -0000
Some comments:
"(i) remove any possibility of free transactions unless
associated with basic transaction data;"
I believe it is not possible to prevent free transactions for the
reason that people can pay out of band (via existing banking transfers
to miners) or make payments to addresses belonging to miners (that are
contingent on the requested user transaction being processed via input
dependency) .
I am not sure I fully understand the way you see monetisation working,
and you do indicate this is quite far future what-if stage idea, and
you do identify a conflict with fungibility - but I think this is
probably quite badly in conflict with fungibility to the point of
conflicting with many planned Bitcoin improvements? And mid term
technical directions.
I would say the long term idealised requirements are that the
transaction itself would have cryptographic fungibility, and policy
relating to identity for authorisation, approval in regulated
transactions would take place at the payment protocol layer. The
payment protocol is already seeing some use.
Lightning protocol sees more of the data going point to point and so
not broadcast nor visible for big data analytic monetisation.
Adam
On 22 August 2015 at 23:51, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Again, did you got a bip number asigned or did you self-assigned it yours=
elf?
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Ahmed Zsales via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In response to public and private comments and feedback, we have updated
>> this working draft.
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwEbhrQ4ELzBOUVtOHJQdlhvUmc/view?usp=3D=
sharing
>>
>> Update highlights:
>>
>> 1. Specific clarifications on replacing the Coinbase subsidy and
>> supplementing and not replacing transaction fees.
>>
>> 2. Clarification on block chain overhead. The value of data mining is on=
a
>> bell curve, so year six data will be removed every year.
>>
>> 3. Added references to an ability to create global, national and regiona=
l
>> Bitcoin Price Indices for popular baskets of goods transacted with Bitco=
in.
>>
>> 4. Added references for an ability to use structured block chain data fo=
r
>> Bitcoin capacity and fork planning.
>>
>> 5. Removed references to price speculation.
>>
>> 6. Added preferences for deployment dates of January 2017 or January 201=
8.
>>
>> 7. Moving towards BIP format after discussion and evaluation period.
>> Technical content will increase in due course and discussion content wil=
l be
>> removed.
>>
>> Further views and feedback welcome.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ahmed
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Ahmed Zsales <ahmedzsales18@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Here we propose a long-term solution to replace mining rewards and
>>> transactions fees.
>>>
>>> BIP 104 is currently a discussion draft only.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwEbhrQ4ELzBSXpoUjRkc01QUGc/view?usp=
=3Dsharing
>>>
>>> Views and feedback welcome.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ahmed
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
