summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/9b/114f8c69e1b460b6a0a629553f1040bbb23cb8
blob: 2f1f7479c0b86719ac42a42206ca9fda7ac190d7 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <zgenjix@yahoo.com>) id 1SvWOe-0005Yg-FX
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:31:12 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from nm9-vm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.47])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1SvWOd-0002ie-OB for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:31:12 +0000
Received: from [98.138.90.55] by nm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	29 Jul 2012 16:31:06 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.160] by tm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	29 Jul 2012 16:31:06 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1016.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
	29 Jul 2012 16:31:06 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 250729.89641.bm@omp1016.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 52981 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Jul 2012 16:31:06 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: WYJJGv4VM1m8kDXJcXxLmJmp.WSaMoj4sWWzH4bbrjCIKKa
	TT4EhE01Hn9vGW1va17hRHoeb_UZaYZj3D0g9btNa3kS5qNSM87uqMLc5WBi
	eqnxdnBBRVxspnkPs8YEP.nCTqcfKMOkhfZV_ssky_iV2dKLwyWv40xl6ZAQ
	7xD4LxXfivhSmj727Vj0mcpUxHUMcMmhtthxS4CsFyt_xCwUFYmZCdG0RGvP
	X0fr5TUVH6mou00OKoQVPPQmSTtTQH790qqBe1D5OtNHK7ia5QAKY7apMETL
	gDNVYeYt0MnyQ2_A8l7Ex_lh50yIFlTNlNv1ve3NuwP6.pxFtzAbmrLtX2LF
	33BaFBTTXLvwI.5vk2PpQYl.yc04IWUHIxyMy9dg98yc0R87G.8sm24cJ2k5
	_3fDl0l90pNSvAaQ-
Received: from [187.54.148.204] by web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:31:06 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.120.356233
Message-ID: <1343579466.30862.YahooMailNeo@web121004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
To: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [98.138.90.47 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(zgenjix[at]yahoo.com)
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_2         FSL_FREEMAIL_2
	0.0 FSL_FREEMAIL_1         FSL_FREEMAIL_1
X-Headers-End: 1SvWOd-0002ie-OB
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] script tests - invalid script in
	script_valid.json?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Amir Taaki <zgenjix@yahoo.com>
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:31:12 -0000

Hi!

Is this a valid script?

["1 0 1", "WITHIN NOT"]

The first value (1) is tested to make sure it is between the lower (0) and upper (1) value. This evaluates to true, placing on the stack a single byte of [01]. NOT then inverses this to a 0 byte false value of [].

What am I missing here?

Thanks