1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
|
Return-Path: <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 340D4ACD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:27:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com (mail-lf0-f51.google.com
[209.85.215.51])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 496A486
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:27:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id z78so8378343lff.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=nCVfpZPTaUVVGFVUgaVw4IXTUOYrQKKy3GLSPSYJHCY=;
b=f+cUFHa+xFQgFd5l0pDEoxvNiCXpE0Q+aHMFjFSubY1kYYy3QSmEw2cHs3N0YIpUOu
zUrWnkHW+/WXEBx+vgCGuDyjtRnHFSQ9jafnB3qdnmCEC3A9l44w8VZhvP0iXkv1zNS3
BL9hmfnZu7yr1dUezLjZL6KORr2xGYyDIKozBOSIOCAAA6pBc0BI19AnLtx+1S6Bbm4A
XbkfvPp6Yo+z2gLe6jxgG+3942yS0SHhz/TlDr453pajtKwrjhv1tL2gZGb8oGJrAc9l
JWxpkAwlV4P9s8dk4vGyLDxZnQZCHfOq8G/T6uZi3r1pHTR8Z83p212Xw14wZU8pQ540
Ekpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=nCVfpZPTaUVVGFVUgaVw4IXTUOYrQKKy3GLSPSYJHCY=;
b=fogyv9htkJfptrt5DxfysuD36G9dSNsMp/FaUV2KaMFmwGn3ZKHg0y+sa9p3e5AJNN
p7WtN+FNxq0JUqeGe/gvZWfRT4XEWG6crkznfXcMJOKhZSUEOu5bSf7PE7rR4c38csVN
HcUWXN48o79jV4nU3XSdcaf5c5kINFVg4JWEYstLbkCEUO0gausX0RQ2m25ezJPktiYG
xrE5lUdcl5WyFaqdf2vZ3EcxqTObuW00AmiJlgyOxsOFLoUGtBXigbOQG3oOTs8yU77Y
z8d3/5+99w8wzfUqpQ61fMMpAfOFYirkonVaVnPrvN5j7cosWB8zyWqghrt/io9+FBBn
mlnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1123BCng6MBlyj+BOyULTV+QGeMxFkN/e2IHVi0R0n3BnK67/n7s
wMwIYk4wv/QV4eCsL1+8b2743axXlg==
X-Received: by 10.46.14.18 with SMTP id 18mr1229006ljo.41.1499844453557; Wed,
12 Jul 2017 00:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.29.139 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:27:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a9ad2dd0-a949-643f-9375-a95015020066@gmail.com>
References: <0119661e-a11a-6d4b-c9ec-fd510bd4f144@gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgRDVgdMYZo776iLwbm23aGNDWL85YgD=yF=M-0_vqJ5nQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1c1d06a9-2e9f-5b2d-42b7-d908ada4b09e@gmail.com>
<A030CDEA-CB0F-40BF-9404-6BD091537BE1@taoeffect.com>
<08078429-089f-9315-2f76-a08121c5378c@gmail.com>
<D30D8852-EFF4-4AB3-9B97-53D622A1440A@taoeffect.com>
<a9ad2dd0-a949-643f-9375-a95015020066@gmail.com>
From: Jacob Eliosoff <jacob.eliosoff@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 03:27:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAUaCyhdOJ3BxLd6QCqx19PxGDw5qM1YF5poZV8Jkp+RrmcR7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Sztorc <truthcoin@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e9f2edf6d18055419bffe"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:27:32 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Updating the Scaling Roadmap
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 07:27:36 -0000
--f403045e9f2edf6d18055419bffe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Just a quick note in favor of an updated roadmap (some may object to that
label, but I think it's fine). When you and your friends are planning your
weekly movie outing, it's very helpful to have someone who knows the group,
knows what films are playing, checks people's preferences, mails around
proposals, updates with corrections, keeps a list of choices for future
weeks, etc. (Certainly not the same as imposing an agenda, except when the
coordinator gets pushy.)
Core veterans like those on this thread are well placed to compile (not
decree) such a document - basically an informed view of what looks likely
to get rough consensus, and in what order. *Of course* some will dispute
the priorities etc, but it's my experience that if everyone virtuously
refrains from this kind of coordination effort, often the weekend rolls by
without a film.
Agreed that specific deadlines often create more problems than they solve,
but even without dates, clarifying priorities (eg, segwit before HF) is
still useful.
All this is aside from the fact that I have many criticisms of the "movies
chosen" so far and the criteria used to choose them - another thread
(basically, I support an interpretation of "consensus" that takes more note
of non-dev constituents). The consensus-marshaling effort is still
important, and appreciated.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> And please try to avoid going off-topic -- this is supposed to be about
> the idea of a new roadmap.
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--f403045e9f2edf6d18055419bffe
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Just a quick note in favor of an updated roadmap (some may=
object to that label, but I think it's fine).=C2=A0 When you and your =
friends are planning your weekly movie outing, it's very helpful to hav=
e someone who knows the group, knows what films are playing, checks people&=
#39;s preferences, mails around proposals, updates with corrections, keeps =
a list of choices for future weeks, etc. =C2=A0(Certainly not the same as i=
mposing an agenda, except when the coordinator gets pushy.)<div><br></div><=
div>Core veterans like those on this thread are well placed to compile (not=
decree) such a document - basically an informed view of what looks likely =
to get rough consensus, and in what order. =C2=A0<i>Of course</i> some will=
dispute the priorities etc, but it's my experience that if everyone vi=
rtuously refrains from this kind of coordination effort, often the weekend =
rolls by without a film.</div><div><br></div><div>Agreed that specific dead=
lines often create more problems than they solve, but even without dates, c=
larifying priorities (eg, segwit before HF) is still useful.</div><div><br>=
</div><div><div><div>All this is aside from the fact that I have many criti=
cisms of the "movies chosen" so far and the criteria used to choo=
se them - another thread (basically, I support an interpretation of "c=
onsensus" that takes more note of non-dev constituents).=C2=A0 The con=
sensus-marshaling effort is still important, and appreciated.</div></div></=
div><div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote=
">On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D=
"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=
=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>=
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
=20
=20
=20
<div text=3D"#000000" bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><span class=3D"">
<div class=3D"m_5553629037657181519moz-cite-prefix">And please try to a=
void going off-topic -- this is supposed to be
about the idea of a new roadmap.<br></div></span><span class=3D"HOEnZb"=
><font color=3D"#888888">
<br>
Paul
</font></span></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></di=
v>
--f403045e9f2edf6d18055419bffe--
|
