summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/99/a6c0e21cdb7edbeba433268574c588f35a88cd
blob: c768675b9eef97f7997a7bd3549f9f3b1aa0262e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <kravets@gmail.com>) id 1VhFql-0000Qn-9G
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:38:03 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.160.49 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.160.49; envelope-from=kravets@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pb0-f49.google.com; 
Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com ([209.85.160.49])
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1VhFqk-0002Qt-2H
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:38:03 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f49.google.com with SMTP id um1so3325113pbc.36
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:37:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.190.101 with SMTP id gp5mr6045603pac.23.1384508276201;
	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.76.98 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:37:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131115092338.GN5661@leitl.org>
References: <CAKaEYhK4oXH3hB7uS3=AEkA6r0VB5OYyTua+LOP18rq+rYajHg@mail.gmail.com>
	<52852C2D.9020103@gmail.com> <52853D8A.6010501@monetize.io>
	<CAJHLa0M6CkoDbD6FFixf9-mmhug7DvehSWCJ+EHWVxUDuwNiBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<52854F59.9000500@monetize.io> <5285545C.4030607@gmail.com>
	<20131115092338.GN5661@leitl.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 01:37:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CALMbsiKktwOVfLv2DZMBXVtWVMbtvK2uSUMKriY+PndzYLmzZg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alex Kravets <kravets@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf16084fde42b04eb33f308
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
	See
	http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
	for more information. [URIs: linkedin.com]
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(kravets[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1VhFqk-0002Qt-2H
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] moving the default display to mbtc
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:38:03 -0000

--047d7bf16084fde42b04eb33f308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi guys,

I've seen many many non-geeks be utterly intimidated and confused by
0.000XXXXX quantities and/or mBTC & uBTC notation


Yes, $10 being rougnly 10,000 Won in South Korean is a great example where
large amounts of units work very well in a major economy.


FWIW,  I would prefer the entire switch-over be done *once* *and *at the
same time switching both BTC to XBT and using the following


Currency Code *: *XBT
Unit Definition  *: *1 Bit = 100 Satoshis

Addition benefit is splitting the term Bitcoin/bitcoin (as in Network and
currency unit) into Bitcoin (network) and Bit (the unit).


Perhaps this project/process should have a name and be listed on a road map
somewhere

*BRCS: *Bitcoin Re-denomination and [Currency] Code Standardization project


Cheers ...





On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:53:16PM -0500, Alan Reiner wrote:
> > I really like the XBT idea.  It makes a lot of sense to match the ISO
>
> I really don't. Just use the SI prefixes.
>
> > currency symbol (though the ISO guys will have to adjust the way they've
> > defined the "XBT").  And I do agree that going right to uBTC and
> > skipping mBTC makes sense, too.
>
> The display units should be choosable by the user.
>
> > I'd prefer them not be called "micro bitcoins."  I really want to call
> > them "microbes" ... but I'm not sure that has the right flavor for money
>
> Why on earth?
>
> > transfer :)  "Please give me 872 microbes".  Perhaps we just call them
> > "bits."  Or even "micros" or "microbits".  As I write this, I realize
> > there's probably 872 threads on the forums about this already...
> >
> > But we would want to promote a consistent term, to avoid further
> > confusion when people use different names for the new unit.  It's not
> > guaranteed to be successful, but if we pick a good name, and build it
> > into the interface on the first release pushing the new unit, we have a
> > chance to make the transition even easier.
>
> The reason SI prefixes were invented is exactly to preven that case.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
> OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
> Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
> Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>



-- 
Alex Kravets <http://www.linkedin.com/in/akravets>       def redPill = '
Scala <http://www.scala-lang.org/>
[[ brutal honesty <http://goo.gl/vwydt> is the best policy ]]

--047d7bf16084fde42b04eb33f308
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi guys,<div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve seen many many non-ge=
eks be utterly intimidated and confused by 0.000XXXXX quantities and/or mBT=
C &amp; uBTC notation</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Yes, $10 bein=
g rougnly 10,000 Won in South Korean is a great example where large amounts=
 of units work very well in a major economy.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>FWIW, =C2=A0I would prefer the entire sw=
itch-over be done <b>once</b> <i>and </i>at the same time=C2=A0switching bo=
th BTC to XBT and using the following</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><d=
iv><div>
Currency Code=C2=A0<b>:=C2=A0</b>XBT</div><div>Unit Definition =C2=A0<b>: <=
/b>1 Bit =3D 100 Satoshis</div><div><br></div><div>Addition benefit is spli=
tting the term Bitcoin/bitcoin (as in Network and currency unit) into Bitco=
in (network) and Bit (the unit).</div>
<div><br></div></div><div><br></div><div>Perhaps this project/process shoul=
d have a name and be listed on a road map somewhere</div><div><b><br></b></=
div><div><b>BRCS: </b>Bitcoin Re-denomination and [Currency] Code Standardi=
zation<b> </b>project</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers ...<br></div><div><br></div><div>=
<br></div><div><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Eugen Leitl <span dir=3D=
"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:eugen@leitl.org" target=3D"_blank">eugen@leitl.=
org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"im">On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05=
:53:16PM -0500, Alan Reiner wrote:<br>
&gt; I really like the XBT idea. =C2=A0It makes a lot of sense to match the=
 ISO<br>
<br>
</div>I really don&#39;t. Just use the SI prefixes.<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
&gt; currency symbol (though the ISO guys will have to adjust the way they&=
#39;ve<br>
&gt; defined the &quot;XBT&quot;). =C2=A0And I do agree that going right to=
 uBTC and<br>
&gt; skipping mBTC makes sense, too.<br>
<br>
</div>The display units should be choosable by the user.<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
&gt; I&#39;d prefer them not be called &quot;micro bitcoins.&quot; =C2=A0I =
really want to call<br>
&gt; them &quot;microbes&quot; ... but I&#39;m not sure that has the right =
flavor for money<br>
<br>
</div>Why on earth?<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>
&gt; transfer :) =C2=A0&quot;Please give me 872 microbes&quot;. =C2=A0Perha=
ps we just call them<br>
&gt; &quot;bits.&quot; =C2=A0Or even &quot;micros&quot; or &quot;microbits&=
quot;. =C2=A0As I write this, I realize<br>
&gt; there&#39;s probably 872 threads on the forums about this already...<b=
r>
&gt;<br>
&gt; But we would want to promote a consistent term, to avoid further<br>
&gt; confusion when people use different names for the new unit. =C2=A0It&#=
39;s not<br>
&gt; guaranteed to be successful, but if we pick a good name, and build it<=
br>
&gt; into the interface on the first release pushing the new unit, we have =
a<br>
&gt; chance to make the transition even easier.<br>
<br>
</div>The reason SI prefixes were invented is exactly to preven that case.<=
br>
<div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
DreamFactory - Open Source REST &amp; JSON Services for HTML5 &amp; Native =
Apps<br>
OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access<br>
Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.<br=
>
Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!<br=
>
<a href=3D"http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=3D63469471&amp;iu=
=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk" target=3D"_blank">http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gam=
pad/clk?id=3D63469471&amp;iu=3D/4140/ostg.clktrk</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>=
<a href=3D"http://www.linkedin.com/in/akravets" target=3D"_blank">Alex Krav=
ets</a>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 def <span style=3D"color:rgb(204,0,0)">re=
dPill</span> =3D &#39;<a href=3D"http://www.scala-lang.org/" target=3D"_bla=
nk">Scala</a><br>
[[ <a href=3D"http://goo.gl/vwydt" target=3D"_blank">brutal honesty</a> is =
the best policy ]]<br>
</div>

--047d7bf16084fde42b04eb33f308--