blob: bc2c9b63a7429ac521f48fdcade92b132237b8a3 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <tamas@bitsofproof.com>) id 1VZkjG-0001NF-8e
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:59:18 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.66])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VZkjC-0002WY-KH
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:59:18 +0000
Received: from [37.143.74.116] (helo=[192.168.1.5]); authenticated
by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
id 1VZkQk-0005DH-C0; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:40:10 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.289181.1382717617.21953.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:40:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C3388417-98E9-4C80-8E26-05DD9BB6E9C2@bitsofproof.com>
References: <mailman.289181.1382717617.21953.bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1382720354;
4f9a2bd5;
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1VZkjC-0002WY-KH
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Making fee estimation better
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 16:59:18 -0000
Two thoughts:
1. Please keep it simple, miner will override it either.
2. If block construction algorithm compares alternate chains and not =
individual transactions, then receiver can bump up the fee by spending =
the unconfirmed output again with higher fee, no need for replacement in =
the mempool.
Tamas Blummer
|
