1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jeremy@taplink.co>) id 1WINHt-0001ii-Sl
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:03:29 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of taplink.co
designates 50.117.27.232 as permitted sender)
client-ip=50.117.27.232; envelope-from=jeremy@taplink.co;
helo=mail.taplink.co;
Received: from mail.taplink.co ([50.117.27.232])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with smtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1WINHt-0006X3-60 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:03:29 +0000
Received: from laptop-air ([192.168.168.135]) by mail.taplink.co
; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:03:27 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
To: "Mike Hearn" <mike@plan99.net>, Drak <drak@zikula.org>
References: <E1FDB3F2-25ED-4B99-979E-12CE943CBD66@kill-bill.org>
<CANEZrP10z6_UAHD97mj22kVEGyXgHPQ2PdP_8RxHT5Py+xRP_A@mail.gmail.com>
<D6BCC0C4-EF22-4DE8-868E-825D19C387E3@kill-bill.org>
<CANEZrP0FzTGmp1zbaW1VHJLk5117ZnTSehfF4uMX=+UFS+R_Dw@mail.gmail.com>
<0CC0BE1D-1DAA-4994-B034-EB7712F845CF@kill-bill.org>
<DBA255DB-4839-4C3A-BA62-BD3926995C12@kill-bill.org>
<CAEY8wq6F33814d2+97AqDoAicvh=0PigHZ03wHadMq6JqtQMLg@mail.gmail.com>
<EAEC76DA-A490-4A61-BFB7-611D4ADF1680@kill-bill.org>
<CAEY8wq5=pAMTqDPM8yeCF+Z2=1GWmD0UDQdgacN1o3jAUh_BYA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAEY8wq40RxeUYYJS2m=xq26iTd2NE64WR7QOUO0+yR-MJQCoxQ@mail.gmail.com>
<5F91BEBF-ECDD-4CBD-A85E-FD7E7DB3F01F@kill-bill.org>
<81FBEA67-45A9-4531-BEA0-071CE9FAEF7E@kill-bill.org>
<CANEZrP0-LqFC8N500=mnKbKE+=UtFw_Y5cHR8JRC-zmmGsSAjA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANAnSg3LF6m9u-MV8XiiomMPrbihJh7hm5o=menOWY71bLkdAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:03:24 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Jeremy Spilman" <jeremy@taplink.co>
Organization: TapLink
Message-ID: <op.xbupvyvryldrnw@laptop-air>
In-Reply-To: <CANAnSg3LF6m9u-MV8XiiomMPrbihJh7hm5o=menOWY71bLkdAg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WINHt-0006X3-60
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>, Stephane
Brossier <stephane@kill-bill.org>,
Pierre-Alexandre Meyer <pierre@kill-bill.org>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Extension for BIP-0070 to support
recurring payments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:03:30 -0000
>
> So in summary the spec needs daily as an option, and to specify the
> recurring cycle as every n*period >(one of daily, weekly, monthly,
> yearly): and you can drop quarterly since it's just expressed as per
> >3*monthly.
If you're going to go the direction of a {unitType, unitsPerInterval}
tuple, then I think the only two units you could ever want are minutes and
months. All other standard units of time can be expressed in terms of
those two, right?
Also consider changing "optional uint64 ends = 4;" to be a interval count
instead of a UTC timestamp, to avoid any ambiguity over how the 'while'
loop should be implemented.
|
