1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <root@haskoin.com>) id 1YBTLv-0005aS-GN
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:11:39 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of haskoin.com
designates 192.64.117.33 as permitted sender)
client-ip=192.64.117.33; envelope-from=root@haskoin.com;
helo=erelay4.ox.registrar-servers.com;
Received: from erelay4.ox.registrar-servers.com ([192.64.117.33])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YBTLu-00057s-24
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:11:39 +0000
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by erelay1.ox.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
9982E2207EFF; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:58:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from erelay1.ox.registrar-servers.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (erelay.ox.registrar-servers.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with LMTP id IK5t8Zs3-PtZ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:58:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap10.ox.privateemail.com (imap10.ox.privateemail.com
[192.64.116.221])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by erelay1.ox.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id
BDA472207EE0; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:58:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3E92400AA;
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:58:10 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap10.ox.privateemail.com
Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (imap10.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with LMTP id b0ZHU2s4P5WG; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:58:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.164.57] (unknown [46.7.118.40])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 475E82400D4;
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:58:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54B6BC3F.6050805@haskoin.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:58:07 +0000
From: Jean-Pierre Rupp <root@haskoin.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: devrandom <c1.sf-bitcoin@niftybox.net>,
Ruben de Vries <ruben@blocktrail.com>
References: <CABETNRtquBWEZZ=jOcWojcgMTpjU5nWP9p74DArLxOXqqQT7og@mail.gmail.com>
<1421257150.8969.4.camel@niftybox.net>
In-Reply-To: <1421257150.8969.4.camel@niftybox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1YBTLu-00057s-24
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] convention/standard for sorting public
keys for p2sh multisig transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:11:39 -0000
We in Haskoin do the same.
On 14/01/15 17:39, devrandom wrote:
> At CryptoCorp we recommend to our customers that they sort
> lexicographically by the public key bytes of the leaf public keys. i.e.
> the same as BitPay.
--
Be Happy :)
|
