1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
|
Return-Path: <dentondevelopment@protonmail.com>
Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FC1C1786
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:44:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C4C228AC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:44:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id lQP15f+6WF9W
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:44:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-40138.protonmail.ch (mail-40138.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.138])
by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3A6921526
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:44:36 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:44:27 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail; t=1608255873;
bh=l+7+9IKi/J46v+4WoT2TAr9117+ODg3KXCAs5thMIlk=;
h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
b=o4f5reShmd7I67kTIumSVLPZXJo4TzdQvZQb9MdmfmO31vmOfJ5h7nLONUz/hs3+Z
3SwnfDaq6k4yhcMwnqXJ0Wfw/CanX4eozU8XoAtU5iKfut7MvNRnKHXdPXcErzgjs+
i9RBNiwGkLSWn7QonAafljSxr48HFbl2CNoMxvWw=
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
From: dentondevelopment <dentondevelopment@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: dentondevelopment <dentondevelopment@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <MMFMtQ1lNQcLBIv8haKSpykMjFISWeyYWbFZC7dkzliEZrf2vZYw6ThqFWSYzIntVT3bXvTUol_l-P9wxUIFhwL38lKSGHBFsRG-ukRirP4=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <202012161716.54878.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <cLqW9ZphcaV5hoVNYHjHk_DsdVw_0_hdFxOFwtFkVT9_N_E1IF7ZvtQq745wbqMnny4xzHe8Xdd9TTi2MLyLhB51cI_PJc4fIjLRSpZpGwk=@protonmail.com>
<1_mYgDaVRKZIADl9fWVzTYGNBr0Z43Fp-Gcoz2ibhKY4VKAk1Vbs9XSZ3rlzyGEwvE2YEOn2C0IxAVKkr_rr6KX0YxMiNTiTtQVBL4vgyd8=@protonmail.com>
<202012161716.54878.luke@dashjr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:51:19 +0000
Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] bip48 proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:44:39 -0000
Hi Luke,
It looks to have the same motivations and be compatible with https://github=
.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 (if I am reading it correctly).
The only guidance I have on proposing a bip is what is on the readme https:=
//github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki
48 would be fitting if it is unused.
This is still very much a work in progress and there does seem to be commun=
ity support.
Pavol and others have shared relevant info/suggestions which I will be usin=
g to update the proposal.
Will share again here when the next draft is ready.
Many thanks,
Fontaine
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me=
ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
On Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:16 AM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote=
:
> BIP number 48 has not been assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers.
>
> Is this intended to be compatible with
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 ?
>
> Luke
>
> On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
> > Here is the repo instead of a static link:
> > https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki
> > Fontaine
> > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Origina=
l Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=
=90
> > On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via bitcoin-=
dev
>
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> > > Hello,
> > > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the
> > > purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations.
> > > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input
> > > welcome.
> > > Regards,
> > > Fontaine
|
