1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1QodQa-0004Pj-Qy
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:32:12 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
designates 208.79.240.5 as permitted sender)
client-ip=208.79.240.5; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me;
helo=smtpauth.rollernet.us;
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us ([208.79.240.5])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.76) id 1QodQa-0001Pu-3A
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:32:12 +0000
Received: from smtpauth.rollernet.us (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15ABB594031
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 08:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bluematt.me (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:2:20c:29ff:fe16:f239])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: @bluematt.me)
by smtpauth.rollernet.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 08:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666] (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:9ff2:1:ee55:f9ff:fec6:e666])
by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8473E2698
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:32:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgQc9a_-Qnv666c4gdkC0+jjk1QwAY8gMQv9Ts74LLaYbg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANEZrP1-BaNmKhSPXSe2sjH0-DPm62_=OQ_S6aCT3-nLdFLLGA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJ1JLtuRhqwcCWjv+H2XUjsX-Za9ZkSkOsH3t=JaUu1581RGUA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP2Cr1mVcj3CQQNx6BeWSb=hzxawva2Lz=sAbjx4AwYdmw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJ1JLttf+h5J8ehmx1j5P1GiGYAUiLN=fGjSV_dLoy72XQohfA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPiTikUc5At5r8XH_5paQ2odx_bib0FGO4OqhGCeQEZ_VRkz0w@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP0DDkeuDwNZA+WV3LGXp0Q31ZJeJAWiV=6Xm+f=ZusrhQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgQc9a_-Qnv666c4gdkC0+jjk1QwAY8gMQv9Ts74LLaYbg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:32:00 +0200
Message-ID: <1312385520.6416.1.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rollernet-Abuse: Processed by Roller Network Mail Services. Contact
abuse@rollernet.us to report violations. Abuse policy:
http://rollernet.us/abuse.php
X-Rollernet-Submit: Submit ID 7dc7.4e3969e7.a63ee.0
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1QodQa-0001Pu-3A
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds returning gone peers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:32:12 -0000
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 10:48 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net> wrote:
> >> There's a bigger problem here honestly. The p2p network is just starved
> >> for connectable slots.
> >
> > Suggestions:
> > - massively increasing all the anti-DoS limits in 0.4, so far they've caused
> > a lot more damage than they solved.
They were redone in .24 to the point that they should not cause any such
issues in the future.
>
> You can't "massively increase" the number of available connection
> slots without risking running nodes on lower memory systems (e.g. VMs)
> out of memory.
>
> Moreover, 125 slots should be more than enough. We need to figure out
> why it isn't.
Agreed.
|
