1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
|
Return-Path: <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1262E51
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:05:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com
[209.85.223.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5D56163
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:05:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 9so86981158iom.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:05:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc
:content-type; bh=l2pGj1a/TRGedOi54qas2F6XuozVyaaxmtRaS9VJbag=;
b=uJjUR0cvzHzGY7PCVSY4Q8QV43fevuK0+mskYwjVLxEm3whQ6BW5l9ioq9Eisj71v0
jfl/P8lrsu/nuhFdjniqsm3hfa1cYwnlWp5623Wh01flVabMbXPQlpJ/Vchyrsu2nHIm
JP/FkNEc2PqkVwajKH1NsB4/DhXX/wdrb/95WBaYJnLe2VLfll4yGhFnF+Md9cQYJSyh
ryU37VvxjaB+SJPWM6D6+Yolh2bYJLqcuZV+vmUeJOkBEo4L4e9/zHG3ZFyiEl1/Zn73
6iouWemSaPSvyT/W0ZbdltIFmtqXr9X7Ot11lLPGWdZIanisL86vXpRreYJss1iU9ye3
whJA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type;
bh=l2pGj1a/TRGedOi54qas2F6XuozVyaaxmtRaS9VJbag=;
b=R7iUj2sbYSl9FAJn+Ued1MG8Em/5DKwKBBxRvy9ToXvxelas7LqFdlwAwIpguIEFzk
Ji51A/PCgDKUU9VF/Iz1bz9/dSP78joh+O1nd8nsfpnE/uuS8fxfrC+Oj/vaujOfynDU
kSzOYsSzFlMTBpfCgke7hSwa9D7FRf6G/eHoaHGwgp754fIuUjGyA67vPisl9cTOMip2
Sg8UEQi4oCOD3XzsaQZQtjPzwB60zJsLj4J/nH6qf6F55Ylqzz3yI7OHd1vbgk3WYHxc
nEirOzN8gVneURy1qfgtq8z/SEG/3nb3rOMZCgRuc1waMuRR298y/pfib6MAOJykEG9H
wtCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOR/NzPuZJNEO3prkjuYbmT6VDbrOVOT7fOqgvE9A/1h1pDFXxgcIvWgZCbEVLrZ5AG/5s0kHvqx8kk7OA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.17.147 with SMTP id 19mr2253673ior.109.1455271508216;
Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:05:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.79.77.65 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 02:05:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <23e401d16552$996546d0$cc2fd470$@xbt.hk>
References: <CAE-z3OUpaMLxF9dGttzLUd6tG+nO18FMo3LZqr7taASVmrEumg@mail.gmail.com>
<23e401d16552$996546d0$cc2fd470$@xbt.hk>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:05:08 +0000
Message-ID: <CAE-z3OUqEXpwGiOdv_X=T_CmtP+wwrAJALQT=Bm42K=k4mMV3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ff3264c9944052b8fcd64
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_HEADERS,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP CPRKV: Check private key verify
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:05:10 -0000
--001a113ff3264c9944052b8fcd64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:02 AM, <jl2012@xbt.hk> wrote:
> Seems it could be done without any new opcode:
>
The assumption was that the altcoin would only accept standard output
scripts. Alice's payment in step 2 pays to a non-standard script.
This is an improvement over the cut and choose, but it will only work for
coins which allow non-standard scripts (type 2 in the BIP).
I guess I was to focused on maintaining standard scripts on the altcoin.
--001a113ff3264c9944052b8fcd64
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On F=
ri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:02 AM, <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jl201=
2@xbt.hk" target=3D"_blank">jl2012@xbt.hk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left:1ex"><div link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple" lang=3D"EN-HK"><=
div><p class=3D"MsoNormal"><span style=3D"font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quo=
t;Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">Seems it could be done without an=
y new opcode:</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The as=
sumption was that the altcoin would only accept standard output scripts.=C2=
=A0 Alice's payment in step 2 pays to a non-standard script.<br><br></d=
iv><div>This is an improvement over the cut and choose, but it will only wo=
rk for coins which allow non-standard scripts (type 2 in the BIP).=C2=A0 <b=
r><br>I guess I was to focused on maintaining standard scripts on the altco=
in.<br></div></div></div></div>
--001a113ff3264c9944052b8fcd64--
|
