summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/94/74a4a92cb0930796809e340d3a9066118d26c3
blob: ca9cb3a4fdebb022ae781d1729b99e786a3d281b (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1WaoZO-0000Lg-KA
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:49:46 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.181; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f181.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WaoZN-00069A-Sg
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:49:46 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id gq1so642707obb.40
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.213.194 with SMTP id nu2mr894800obc.82.1397749780564;
	Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.96.180 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC1+kJPvzxsSDg3joraZbv_r1RroK9d6-v9O_15g6S7B46TwQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC1+kJMrpx0tyE8d0wkwjBthhSPMCdr=9LrJHQFTF4G1vg4MAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T1HGwozy8pY+iStGZPmjenu0RQBVdtOy5ibiWG0BM4mZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC1+kJPvzxsSDg3joraZbv_r1RroK9d6-v9O_15g6S7B46TwQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 17:49:40 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FHy-oYKRSoiP0oAPvRbC0sxRDro
Message-ID: <CANEZrP3s9SpBWxLYMvF5cLK4UeKS2SdKOLpNr40NKGoAzh=3nw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2e15c27d2a704f73efb39
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WaoZN-00069A-Sg
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Timed testing
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:49:46 -0000

--001a11c2e15c27d2a704f73efb39
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
> 2) If I wanted to measure validation performance, to get the number of
> peak tps that could be processed without taking block sides or network
> latency into account, how would I do that? Has anybody tried this
> before?


You can just reindex/replay the chain. It's been done many times.

--001a11c2e15c27d2a704f73efb39
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex">2) If I wanted to measure validation performance=
, to get the number of<br>

peak tps that could be processed without taking block sides or network<br>
latency into account, how would I do that? Has anybody tried this<br>
before?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>You can just reindex/replay the cha=
in. It&#39;s been done many times.=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>

--001a11c2e15c27d2a704f73efb39--