1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <calebdelisle@lavabit.com>) id 1TPZvD-0003vG-1d
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:21:03 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of lavabit.com
designates 72.249.41.33 as permitted sender)
client-ip=72.249.41.33; envelope-from=calebdelisle@lavabit.com;
helo=karen.lavabit.com;
Received: from karen.lavabit.com ([72.249.41.33])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1TPZvB-00031q-V3 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:21:02 +0000
Received: from b.earth.lavabit.com (b.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.11])
by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801C811BD85
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:20:56 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from 10.0.0.4 (pool-74-106-76-145.spfdma.east.verizon.net
[74.106.76.145]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id X5UDFG53PS6A
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:20:56 -0500
Message-ID: <5082B303.9090908@lavabit.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:19:47 -0400
From: Caleb James DeLisle <calebdelisle@lavabit.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <5082561E.4030907@yahoo.com>
<CA+s+GJDBEkYrZ5izTOkGwxytKH4Vb=v4XgHBE2bg62G740Y+9Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJDBEkYrZ5izTOkGwxytKH4Vb=v4XgHBE2bg62G740Y+9Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [72.249.41.33 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1TPZvB-00031q-V3
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Hosting of compiled bitcoin client
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:21:03 -0000
Another concern is sourceforge being attacked and a backdoored client uploaded.
Most people don't check signatures and I seem to recall sourceforge having some
vulnerabilities stemming from their "your own website on sourceforge" feature.
It looks like Github takes security a little bit more seriously.
Probably the best is to ask for free hosting from a reputable security conscious
bitcoin enthusiast but that basically means Tux and he's already an SPOF in the
coineverse.
Thanks,
Caleb
On 10/20/2012 04:33 AM, Wladimir wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Mark Lister <mark.lister@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> The issue is not cryptography, it's "trade with sanctioned countries",
>> period, where making
>>> files available to download is considered trade.
>>
>> Spot on, in 2005 when I lived in (among other places) Sudan, Sourceforge
>> would block certain downloads (but not the project site). That said it
>> was trivial to bypass the restrictions then.
>
> I don't think it's related to these sanctions but to the Great
> Firewall of China, but sourceforge downloads are also blocked in
> China. Also quite easy to bypass though.
>
> Wladimir
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
|
