1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA79C0032
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C794E4090E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org C794E4090E
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dashjr.org header.i=@dashjr.org
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=zinan header.b=dxHVGIz0
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 3IJGWqbppLUi
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:09:03 by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org DD6EF40134
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6EF40134
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:29:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.77.250] (unknown [12.151.133.18])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8EE0838AF3C4;
Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:20:40 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dashjr.org; s=zinan;
t=1677781241; bh=uJZmPwfc96ZtjragIfrcDbfNqpPp14VvbGNN6eGVmN8=;
h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To;
b=dxHVGIz0UGmuohHmG2SlAYq4tW+8tYiz6HsxSIoToSD+QQpjivXXPdYPcwwhRf6XA
ERXJ1mqE31izMDtDjyjdrfSCkSawILXq9aL/jwYQ8anMTJ9M9I4m5P6tevc1D8Dg22
4C/0z1mVvUV0eJD8UJp+q+JzaEPdZe8mOA2Al/7o=
Message-ID: <a9357869-2eb0-0e7d-f0c4-536404930e48@dashjr.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 13:20:35 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.8.0
To: kcalvinalvin <calvin@kcalvinalvin.info>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <vymiNsSrjFPbfpdd3z6BMnIqqJ2cC_3J224jD7Rv_7I7bPt0HHufyisjCe67tSGBiluouQoj5wuNVKA12KSmC3pS9Q6NjBSH4OmUbI8U7wQ=@kcalvinalvin.info>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
In-Reply-To: <vymiNsSrjFPbfpdd3z6BMnIqqJ2cC_3J224jD7Rv_7I7bPt0HHufyisjCe67tSGBiluouQoj5wuNVKA12KSmC3pS9Q6NjBSH4OmUbI8U7wQ=@kcalvinalvin.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Using service bit 24 for utreexo signaling in
testnet and signet
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 18:29:48 -0000
This sounds like something that should be written up as a BIP and use a
normal service bit assignment...?
Luke
On 3/2/23 01:55, kcalvinalvin via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Wanted to tell the mailing list that I'll be using service bit 24 (1
> << 24) to signal that nodes are Utreexo capable nodes on testnet and
> signet as requested by the comment in protocol.h in
> bitcoind (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/74981aa02d2b14ad1c0b82d1eb09cf3169eaa8ae/src/protocol.h#L295-L301).
> There are plans to release binaries for the utreexo node
> (github.com/utreexo/utreexod) in the next few months so that power
> users can try it out. I have no plans to release binaries for mainnet
> yet.
>
> Do let me know if someone else is using the same bit to signal for
> something else and we can coordinate accordingly.
>
> Best,
> Calvin
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
