1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1RKCHL-0003xT-ED
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:01:07 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.161.47; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
helo=mail-fx0-f47.google.com;
Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1RKCHK-00050q-L6
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:01:07 +0000
Received: by faas16 with SMTP id s16so7118607faa.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.92.135 with SMTP id r7mr15477033fam.35.1319907660381; Sat,
29 Oct 2011 10:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.2.231 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Oct 2011 10:01:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <564C59F8-8077-4603-8EAC-389C30509F02@ceptacle.com>
References: <CANEZrP1ic4RXFzoqf66MGv=rJe3MgWxVi5nnk2VKkMc4VMCDyw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T3WKv3RLWT+Q6s7cCLzDL3sVRCWfmPiKcSp=_Re05m+zQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSYwUdiyY2XfHhWn+aN_6a72XRKs-8W7ibZM5t0tZ28rg@mail.gmail.com>
<CALf2ePy=3N1JQodP3s9PzH=Af1z-7qGdy_4=QW9-CJmaxYGz5Q@mail.gmail.com>
<7A50EE90-0FFC-45FB-A27F-786AEB23A8CA@ceptacle.com>
<CAAS2fgTx8gEztUt-UrDObMCQtfdzZc52fzS6c1q8mm+a-TjwjQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T3YnK9ogc3J39nO=Q+29daMTDhP2J_FGvpozTGAxD1z6Q@mail.gmail.com>
<1089B122-1274-454C-9097-700D392BF0FA@ceptacle.com>
<CAAS2fgQAo-xxJxVtoXbTMZ3nvQvtiFxeqOKrN5-xxppMgmBdqg@mail.gmail.com>
<564C59F8-8077-4603-8EAC-389C30509F02@ceptacle.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 13:01:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T09Eksb2=GHaNq+UQnVq5BYeaUn0Uc6SUwZ08-2H_ViGQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_Gr=F8nager?= <gronager@ceptacle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RKCHK-00050q-L6
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Detecting OP_EVAL scriptPubKeys that are
to you
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:01:07 -0000
RE: buying me and Gregory a shared beer:
> I would make a "both of two" btc-addresses script transaction using OP_EVAL. And post it.
> You would then not be able to know that you actually got a beer unless I told you so in a mail.
But that transaction won't show up in my bitcoin wallet as bitcoins I can spend.
And even if my wallet DID show me "transactions that involve your keys
but that you can't spend," all I would know is there are N bitcoins
that I can only spend if I can somehow figure out that Gregory has
public key XYZ.
How would I know that unless you told me?
I think the right long-term solution is moving away from bitcoin
addresses as 'pay-to entity' and create an infrastructure where we're
paying people or organizations. But in the short term, I think there
are lots of benefits to creating a new type of bitcoin address built
on top of OP_EVAL that will be very easy for all of our existing
infrastructure to support.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
|
