1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
|
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 780C071F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:21:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com
[209.85.220.48])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CD7E19D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:21:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pabkd10 with SMTP id kd10so86688pab.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=pL/bnFzhNOX5U8qFKckqwZnCEvk5b/gNEUTVyUt7v+Y=;
b=R0NNgxZo1C4znGli7KpT4Bb6q0jVyLCHZxvPWJrcMQs70lEUjY9j5nDRoHvf80AGa+
ZrhSrZv1TpQOlctwiZ0yl67ADBrBD2PgaqVck7jHV+eB3PvWrb8X729flRUVdhvDnT51
MSU/97LqkcIOj/p84j070bolL43jfX8hPT9ylQnOh2MjW0ei2WOBam/2h2qSFxFEK075
GEcbYh9zVAdZ5dlPMsaNUi3d3nC3lVdM0Xl2niJt6ekHcdAxQRWh4Tnavxvtz9Lc/1xZ
RXFZvo1YrF08nmvY5y8TvT5f/npEDFAwYSJYVWWvJCZLutBcAKVkSPrC1g9fuTHjB8tW
83ng==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlk3Q2W/EInORbXdep3CSlD5dfFrtzUB3yRk9hiXs8v9Cio6o4PixpNWZJPsmpSo/efN2ku
X-Received: by 10.66.145.195 with SMTP id sw3mr21385516pab.72.1437675665710;
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.14] (c-67-161-88-20.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [67.161.88.20])
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
si3sm10301431pac.5.2015.07.23.11.21.04
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55B1309D.7020209@voskuil.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 11:21:17 -0700
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Slurms MacKenzie <slurms@gmx.us>,
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <trinity-c358bbcc-a5d1-487f-9aae-730241fc4eac-1437666965282@3capp-mailcom-bs12>
In-Reply-To: <trinity-c358bbcc-a5d1-487f-9aae-730241fc4eac-1437666965282@3capp-mailcom-bs12>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Electrum Server Speed Test
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:21:06 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Does "to process into the index" include time for transport and/or
block validation (presumably by bitcoind) or this this exclusively the
time for Electrum Server to index a validated block?
e
On 07/23/2015 08:56 AM, Slurms MacKenzie via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Similar to the Bitcoin Node Speed Test, this is a quick
> quantitative
look at how the Electrum server software handles under load. The
Electrum wallet is extremely popular, and the distributed servers
which power it are all hosted by volunteers without budget. The server
requires a fully indexed Bitcoin Core daemon running, and produces
sizable external index in order to allow SPV clients to quickly
retrieve their history.
>
>
> 3.9G electrum/utxo 67M electrum/undo 19G electrum/hist
> 1.4G electrum/addr 24G electrum/
>
>
> Based on my own logs produced by the electrum-server console, it
takes this server (Xeon, lots of memory, 7200 RPM RAID) approximately
3.7 minutes per megabyte of block to process into the index. This
seems to hold true through the 10 or so blocks I have in my scroll
buffer, the contents of blocks seem to be of approximately the same
processing load. Continuing this trend with the current inter-block
time of 9.8 minutes, an electrum-server instance running on
modest-high end dedicated server is able to support up to 2.64 MB
block sizes before permanently falling behind the chain.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVsTCdAAoJEDzYwH8LXOFOLpgIAIAe5QBTTgpe2kyYrqamUKNI
uasljmNQi3In/rdxNm9Ga+vwTsBg7f4v/xHVrQYAGxdjjZxs0h9bOmAvuc+p2fad
ZeHC/vewrtLxB2aVj5JVbSk5ik57ePyk3SmghTpGMAhgTIWkceIrxR+Fq7TFOlqn
NGnTuBSSsGL9nY57hIFwMJb2CKdPwMVLL/0gjVQ9Llqt+Fu31eSRhDzHOvJnkofO
xwVrVGgST2GE73np3WA0jvzRHjFgsPnQknhjLGQiTgDKsKL0BywE9/Vke2zVNyP7
cAlTQoScEal++9u0h3D475lsxv43V0Rxafc7W0a/OyfXujJ2AlixgV8PlLwhvaY=
=DK5K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
