summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/91/047b4ede7145c958a53c82f059d7533a430364
blob: 60c1e927a4b681605b3aba71224449a95445b253 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <xor@freenetproject.org>) id 1Xfkkg-0000QB-NU
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:06 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.94])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Xfkkf-000748-76
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:06 +0000
Received: from [89.12.99.57] (helo=anonymous)
	by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa
	(TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <xor@freenetproject.org>) id 1XfkkY-0003cJ-M3
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:17:58 +0200
From: xor <xor@freenetproject.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:17:51 +0200
Message-ID: <2753630.UjohjSx8jx@1337h4x0r>
Organization: Freenet Project
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-37-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CA+s+GJCAWXgpzyQnAar6ecKdcci+tdR8yJjCOUpB=xmj-ytZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+s+GJCAWXgpzyQnAar6ecKdcci+tdR8yJjCOUpB=xmj-ytZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2010651.nOTlrCUOBv";
	micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Df-Sender: eG9yQGZyZWVtYWlsLmJvZ2VydC5kZQ==
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
	no trust [80.67.31.94 listed in list.dnswl.org]
	-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
	1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
X-Headers-End: 1Xfkkf-000748-76
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: xor@freenetproject.org
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:06 -0000


--nextPart2010651.nOTlrCUOBv
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:29:43 AM Wladimir wrote:
> B) I also think it makes sense to move the BIP discussion (both about
> the BIP process and individual BIPs) to a separate mailing list.
> 
> bitcoin-development currently has a dual function: discussion of
> Bitcoin Core implementation concerns, as well as global changes to
> Bitcoin (in the form of BIPs).
> 
> This makes the list too busy for some people, but it is critical that
> everyone writing a Bitcoin node or client is up-to-date with proposals
> and can comment on them.

I joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market 
capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is here 
given the importance of Bitcoin.

So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was 
allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting the 
list up won't help with that.

Greetings
--nextPart2010651.nOTlrCUOBv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=+jWK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2010651.nOTlrCUOBv--