1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FFDE273
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 8 Aug 2015 15:11:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149077.authsmtp.com (outmail149077.authsmtp.com
[62.13.149.77])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF67F2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 8 Aug 2015 15:11:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t78FB0ue089607;
Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:11:00 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [25.109.202.243] ([24.114.75.94]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t78FAvFl047662
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:10:58 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAO2FKHAimcD7r1etc-Wy__1KWppYp7_pLdowO77ACDPWnF2ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAO2FKEFA5ujJKe8F4-5Wnp0DCYuyHWNWhdtk5O=nCZ-zGu0rg@mail.gmail.com>
<3D142DE7-C785-46FB-A2D0-3DEF16892C64@petertodd.org>
<CAAO2FKHAimcD7r1etc-Wy__1KWppYp7_pLdowO77ACDPWnF2ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:10:54 +0000
To: Hector Chu <hectorchu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <BB479452-A490-4849-A7FE-8C5B9D837C93@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: ad0953c8-3ddf-11e5-9f75-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdgoUGUATAgsB AmMbWlJeUV17XGo7 aQ5PbARZfE1LQQxu
T0xPR01TWkFvCWpw QGhCUh11cQNENnt3 Y0YsDyRbVUF5Jk5g
QRoAQ3AHZDJldWlJ V0VFdwNWdQpKLx5G bwR8GhFYa3VsNCMk
FAgyOXU9MCtqYBpS XgALIhoYUA4PGTU/ RhYNVT4oHEseLwAA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.75.94/465
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Hector Chu via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Voting by locking coins
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 15:11:03 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 8 August 2015 11:03:04 GMT-04:00, Hector Chu <hectorchu@gmail.com> wrote:
>Thanks for this Peter. It is quite long winded and complicated so I
>just
>wanted to clarify one particular point. In John's proposal, are the
>coins
>actually locked up, or are they still freely spendable post-vote?
>Otherwise
>there is no real cost to casting votes. Locking coins up is related to
>the
>time-value of money and has a cost the longer they are locked up for.
John Dillon's proposal is essentially to have the economic majority give miners *permission* to raise the blocksize; making the vote costly is against the design intent of accurately capturing the broadest possible economic consensus.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVxhvv
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AH/1/4QjqSS2yYndM5evkl4h9ZJDxpeq++21pDprKn1HSu
a5+0M8bcM1Jlk5+GSFqDLl920yQXTPZ5AOvJ9F6085/g2heGEg2iHP/iJsOGK6xe
VWF/yR8sFYEe41BXP9r/la/AUFPcQWFUBqZgPqDBCqr87k2Hn5d3t0VITNwNHCge
VJKlESGyyg3nMxfrvQq1YspKBkhTpIFMz1aw0CUh3kVOpmW2luFcA7SQzOWfBgDd
3ZExFhcn/5GcK3GudRsvcPNSIZQzeZcX2uQHCzQa7kvPdlZ1XntkE2ojy31Zq0nv
Pj+CDBeKYtr4R0ZEn2bKhq39C3+1SZa5XkuCHAanBbQ=
=vp56
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
