summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/90/6f7110353258a30f5aa0a53113a533f0340687
blob: 7875940956b543c57779f53cdb0dee022c65129e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987FC305
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:38:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com
	[209.85.220.45])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4634A144
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:38:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pabvl15 with SMTP id vl15so70717296pab.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=LboKDJrgJ13SlenlJYBVkWNJFr0BmJReK0aAk8yBw+s=;
	b=GQEEE6nS33q9P1quxK6V+Fd/1Ljx8xifpJccfcyXWCPwaARE3n2+IxghYb59Q+6IeM
	eyQVdvUu//VvTgU3xzjoGPHXqwH2n8sXcA7HxWdpho+GbFykiyyHWLKr6eRp1yNZCHam
	smC2bO3Ve7mOkOflHc9vLNDVM3D1Jayy+wtS2YMBmhK4/Li585Z47JPSAHnjLB7xiXaw
	debZD3Ipo6N+aQMKPn8pdPm/97WAx6IhI35aebHtSna3Wy3ZXFbA6qYIPSByyoK2stho
	IafH96SAjUQDJXGraLNgASTjlFAkpqCuBNC8hYJ5KBxzsUHiDtM7cSnXRff6C1JCyggc
	yb9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnfxK/AJg2mKBrxDKAShRbo0S45sgL7gzqo6O/Ypsh1Et5pPUybZI5uKZFV0RkmFjb3OYoo
X-Received: by 10.70.0.202 with SMTP id 10mr4489853pdg.41.1435333105035;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
	[99.8.65.117])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id r9sm33787228pdp.5.2015.06.26.08.38.22
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <558D71EF.1060603@thinlink.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 08:38:23 -0700
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:38:25 -0000

On 6/26/2015 7:09 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote:
> Furthermore, systems that compete with Bitcoin in this space already
> offer orders of magnitude more capacity than we can reasonably achieve
> with any blockchain technology at this point.

"Reasonably achievable" is a guideline that would keep bitcoin out of
trouble caused by either too little, or too much, declared capacity.=20
This matches Gavin's thinking, though you may differ on the numbers.


>  it seems silly to make a huge increase at once...

Unless it is reasonably achievable.  Leave the rest to the free market.