summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/8e/9a2bf462b33a47eec0d175647fb6ed199e310c
blob: b54aa9753b24e9c539f9f99ce65581a483bb238d (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
Return-Path: <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC7D8DC
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  4 Jul 2016 06:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from server3 (server3.include7.ch [144.76.194.38])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542D6F0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  4 Jul 2016 06:47:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by server3 (Postfix, from userid 115)
	id 9AAB62E60279; Mon,  4 Jul 2016 08:47:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from Jonass-MacBook-Pro-2.local (cable-static-140-182.teleport.ch
	[87.102.140.182]) by server3 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2264B2D002F7
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  4 Jul 2016 08:47:06 +0200 (CEST)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <87h9cecad5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<577224E8.6070307@jonasschnelli.ch> <8760ssdd1u.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CAEM=y+XKQZVz6UieB-nDy_C9xTmXiBB3-atuuZkxzmPoSVPOJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87oa6iavky.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
	<CADorodhC=UvQmiNVSd91dA57PyYydDH+uUUp_Aj5CsN-EG-e4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP+0UNJ9mBCWCNf_kSo+4xJWjmO=eVmrrRi7=dD9_zmU2h3cDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAP+0UNJ77tdC+HK=x4CtYuTECoqzcMMOd8B38O1hnD5gwoNC5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Message-ID: <577A0669.7040208@jonasschnelli.ch>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 08:47:05 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
	Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAP+0UNJ77tdC+HK=x4CtYuTECoqzcMMOd8B38O1hnD5gwoNC5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="miH0FpdCuCM9ibLSWVSXNDcs8VbhGJO9n"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 151 use of HMAC_SHA512
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 06:47:07 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--miH0FpdCuCM9ibLSWVSXNDcs8VbhGJO9n
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="iAS7BIjDLf3FgXh20mRbihpHe3LGHcmP7"
From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Message-ID: <577A0669.7040208@jonasschnelli.ch>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 151 use of HMAC_SHA512
References: <87h9cecad5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
 <577224E8.6070307@jonasschnelli.ch> <8760ssdd1u.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
 <CAEM=y+XKQZVz6UieB-nDy_C9xTmXiBB3-atuuZkxzmPoSVPOJw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87oa6iavky.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
 <CADorodhC=UvQmiNVSd91dA57PyYydDH+uUUp_Aj5CsN-EG-e4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP+0UNJ9mBCWCNf_kSo+4xJWjmO=eVmrrRi7=dD9_zmU2h3cDw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP+0UNJ77tdC+HK=x4CtYuTECoqzcMMOd8B38O1hnD5gwoNC5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP+0UNJ77tdC+HK=x4CtYuTECoqzcMMOd8B38O1hnD5gwoNC5Q@mail.gmail.com>

--iAS7BIjDLf3FgXh20mRbihpHe3LGHcmP7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Arthur
>=20
>     I strongly agree!
>     In crypto we should always follow well-studied open standard rather=

>     than custom construction.

I totally agree.
BIP151 does not introduce new cipher types.
The BIP uses ECDH together with ChaCha20-Poly1305@openssh.
Both very well known and broad used crypo.

/jonas


--iAS7BIjDLf3FgXh20mRbihpHe3LGHcmP7--

--miH0FpdCuCM9ibLSWVSXNDcs8VbhGJO9n
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXegZpAAoJECnUvLZBb1Psb6gQAJreEjzRbk1/9lpCBG+/5HlH
2N+6vZ2r5nkrtt8+Yw2iLfS7MqIqvzCF3NzH8Wu5o30SMwkp7+jmUv1mtfet0arJ
xwYUsyFr4gQUIa1aOpAN2UYbrR9V+vLnm7brHCPB26OI058z7xVIW51F2K7PDRNc
or7nu7vjRCYEMeYnjMlJ+s8FTV+PnlMXe0PqZzub1rIXtcKJ/R4Udm6Opr2dFXBS
M4sNkVafR6FFzM+Yc/JZsxUGWdW+A/ke9YTJU/r/wvW0VdME/DtxR5rCtKIzEVEg
kEPYPXwP4xSqK3893NdvZ+t6fWiM/2ZhXA49kYY5KdMDotJYwhwQ/+dW57XAESp8
kMk5L8FNPqndFwWUFWKkfwKHZEf7fhAQmc8DUPWUvBHyaycunw8z+020ejJtP8W1
TAzH1mTEOb/qNClhXQ1oJB5DQC8ozzwU0F4rff/8E92zuedawb/UbbSEGDCJGp9/
NFRioCT0bPlTgNzyF898bKM6fnQol2bcrvXWEw4ugg5Mu2dZMP21V15OJxtk1TvQ
PRmQMhYBQyFP7KYFJjnxHGK83netHseRHmhGPzkP3bBjhsavitE2DhnEPhgGBE6D
5GtcTXJAOPFzeYB2W9IuMOPGS4SXAiG/A1YeysAS34jy/6v6t8IuZ/h2IlSZLCcB
3zsrxlvvJjjDK+hugFRP
=zh/z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--miH0FpdCuCM9ibLSWVSXNDcs8VbhGJO9n--